Dog & cat feeders unwittingly bait wild predators
Cats hunt, dogs scavenge. When either dog or cat numbers drop, the other changes behavior
MUMBAI, India; MAHAHUAL, Mexico; KATHAMANDU, Nepal; SAN FRANCISCO, California––Recent reports of tiger, jaguar, leopard, and coyote predation in human-dominated habitat come as reminders that the cat/dog relationship, even in the presence of humans, is fundamentally a predator/prey relationship, including when humans are the prey.
Cats hunt.
Dogs scavenge, irrespective of dogs’ role in human habitat as killers of rats, other small prey, and sometimes livestock, even humans.
In a standoff, the dog retreats
Packs of dogs, wolves, coyotes, or jackals, may drive a big cat away from a kill large enough for multiple canines to share, or from making the kill in the first place, but one on one, few dogs will challenge a cat, other than a domestic cat taken unawares.
In a standoff, the dog retreats––even a pit bull, more often than not, which is part of why, even though pit bulls kill cats in 94% of the fatal dog attacks on cats of which ANIMALS 24-7 has found record since 2013, pit bulls kill other dogs three times more often.
(See https://www.animals24-7.org/wp-content/uploads/2026-projected-animals-killed-by-dogs.pdf.)
India: land of contradictions
This has a bearing on why India simultaneously has both a declining street dog population through the work of federally subsidized Animal Birth Control programs nationwide; more fatal dog attacks per year than even during the last now distant decades when rabies rather than dogs’ fangs were the main cause of death; and soaring fatal tiger attacks.
(See Safety from dog attacks is basic human right, India Supreme Court rules.)
These would appear to be contradictions, except that authentic street dogs, without regular human feeders, dispersed to scavenge and hunt rats, rather than forming packs who “defend” their feeding stations, while street dogs are no longer numerous enough on the outskirts of villages within tiger habitat to quickly form packs large enough to rout tigers who might threaten them and their pups.
Pariah dogs & tigers
One dog will not scare a tiger, or a leopard, a troop of marauding macaques, a troop of languors, or a lion or hyena, but a dozen dogs barking an alarm to a hundred others within earshot will, though the tiger or leopard may grab just one dog foolhardy enough to come within leaping range, then run back into the forest for lunch, hoping to outdistance the pack.
The presence of large numbers of pariah dogs skulking around the refuse heaps outside of Indian villages has historically protected villagers working and even herding livestock in forests.
Tigers have historically preferred larger prey, such as sambar, dwelling deeper in forest habitat, out of food competition with domestic cattle, sheep, and goats, though domestic livestock have also always been on the menu if allowed to stray too deep into the woods.
But the forests are shrinking, the dogs are now mostly deeper in the villages, where the dog-feeders are, and both humans and livestock are now ever more vulnerable.
Tigers kill five people in one day
“In one of the deadliest tiger attacks in recent years at India’s densest tiger belt in eastern Maharashtra,” the Times of India reported on May 22, 2026, “four women collecting tendu leaves,” used to roll cigarettes,” were mauled to death in a single strike in Sindewahi forest range of Chandrapur district and a 55-year-old man collecting broomstick grass was killed in Adyal forest range in Bhandara,” about 55 miles away.
“Another woman collecting tendu leaves was critically injured in the Tadoba Andhari tiger reserve,” all in the same afternoon, the Times of India continued.
Altogether, 349 Indians have died in tiger attacks during past five years. This is believed to represent a significant increase from the rate of tiger attack deaths during the first four decades after India outlawed tiger trophy hunting in 1973, but while fatal attacks were reported by media several times per year, especially when individual tigers serially killed villagers, there appears to have been no coordinated effort to tabulate data on what appeared to be isolated events.
Jaguars vs. dogs in Quintana Roo
While dogs are mostly too small to be within the preferred prey range for tigers, dogs are typically just the right size for a jaguar or leopard’s meal, a point underscored by Monica Carral-Garcia in a 2021 paper entitled “Dog predation by jaguars in a tourist town on the Mexican Caribbean,” published in the journal Neotropical Biology and Conservation, followed up in April 2023 by Riviera Maya News, and recently summarized by the Facebook page Lonely Camp.
In Mahahual, in southern Quintana Roo state, Mexico, two miles from Puerto Costa Maya, Mexico’s second-busiest cruise port after Cozumel, street dogs historically slept near beach houses, after spending their days scavenging and cadging handouts from tourists.
Jaguars circa 2012 learned that the beach house dogs were no longer as wary, and beyond that, fatter than the local street dogs had usually been. At the same time, development had cut deeply into traditional jaguar hunting habitat.
Eating dogs altered jaguar behavior
Veterinarian Carral-Garcia and colleagues from El Colegio de la Frontera Sur documented twenty dogs attacked by jaguars during the next seven years.
Hoping to protect both the dogs and to protect the jaguars from possible retaliatory attacks by dog feeders, the local conservation group Proyecto Aak Mahahual and the International Fund for Animal Welfare together donated 120 doghouses to families who, while not admitting the dogs to their homes, pledged to keep the dogs they fed locked up at night.
Nonetheless, by 2023 the jaguar toll on dogs reached 20 per year. About two-thirds of the dogs were killed during the dry season, when wild prey became scarce.
Narrated The Lonely Camp, “Up the coast in Playa del Carmen, another resort city, a jaguar was documented persistently killing dogs over months. Wildlife authorities relocated the jaguar away from human settlements, but the jaguar approached four villages within six miles of the release site and went straight back to killing dogs.”
The presence and availability of dogs as prey had altered jaguar behavior as it had been known for centuries.
“Direct comparison to leopards in India”
The Caral-Garcia paper “draws a direct comparison to leopard behavior in India,” commented The Lonely Camp, “where dogs make up 39 to 64 percent of the [leopard] diet in some regions. Both leopards and jaguars are large solitary cats adapting to landscapes where humans moved in with domestic animals who have no effective anti-predatory behavior.”
But that information is somewhat obsolete.
Already by 2015, twelve years after the Indian national Animal Birth Control program started, “Sanjay Gandhi National Park leopard’s diet has more deer, fewer dogs,” reported Clara Lewis for the Times of India.
Sanjay Gandhi National Park is a 40-square-mile habitat entirely surrounded by metropolitan Mumbai, sustaining an unusually high leopard population density of about one per square mile.
From eating dogs back to wild prey
“A six-month study by Nikit Surve from the Wildlife Institute of India,” done between December 2014 and April 2015,” Lewis wrote, “found that wild prey comprised 57% of the leopard’s diet,” including “chital, sambar, barking deer, wild pig, common langur, bonnet macaque, grey jungle fowl, and red spur fowl.
“Chital and sambar contributed around 17% and 16%, respectively, to the biomass of the leopard’s diet.
“Previous studies,” Lewis summarized, “showed dog as the principal prey for leopards,” while showing “a very minimal presence of cervids [chital and sambar] in the leopards’ diet, although sambar was available in the study area in good numbers.”
As of 2002, one year before the Animal Birth Control program started locally, dogs constituted more than 60% of the Sanjay Gandhi National Park leopards’ diet.
By 2015, Surve found, dogs were only 24.3% of the leopards’ diet.
“Every dog in Mumbai started barking”
Not only were there markedly fewer dogs for leopards to eat, but the reduced presence of dogs brought a marked increase in the chital population, who became significant prey for leopards who could no longer hunt dogs as often.
Lewis, however, credited garbage clearance around Sanjay Gandhi National Park, rather than Animal Birth Control, for the reduction in dog numbers.
The remaining dogs, while fewer, had apparently also become warier. National Geographic video researcher Alex Braczkowski told National Geographic writer Sarah Gibbens in 2018 that when a dog saw a leopard, “every dog in Mumbai started barking,” the response that long kept tigers and leopards away.
Canine distemper
Eating dogs has hazards for leopards and other wild predators beyond the risk of pack attack.
Veterinarian Amir Sadaula of the National Trust for Nature Conservation in Nepal in 2024 found canine distemper virus circulating among leopards, apparently acquired by preying upon dogs.
That discovery followed the deaths from canine distemper of about three dozen Asiatic lions at Gir National Park in Gujarat, on the far side of the Indian subcontinent from Nepal, of unknown direct interaction with dogs.
Coyotes vs. feral cats
Within the U.S., pumas are known to prey upon dogs in suburban habitat with increasing frequency, but not enough for dogs to be a significant part of the puma diet.
By far the most common predatory interaction between felines and canines has long been believed to be coyotes preying upon outdoor cats, presumed to be mostly feral cats, but recent research suggests that much as the leopards of Sanjay National Park in Mumbai are eating fewer dogs as Animal Birth Control reduces the dog population, successful neuter/return projects are taking cats off the coyote menu.
Most recently, University of California at Davis Ph.D. candidate Tali Caspi studied coyote scats found in San Francisco, especially Golden Gate Park, a known urban coyote habitat.
Looked, but seldom found
“I looked for domestic cat DNA in the scats, and I did find it, but not very frequently,” Caspi told SFGate assistant local editor Amanda Bartlett in March 2024.
Cats, said Caspi, are “not at all a big part of [coyote] diets in San Francisco. Out of around 700 scats, I had a few. A handful,” containing feline DNA.
This is consistent with the long-term trend documented since neuter/return began to catch on as a feral cat population control technique in the early 1990s.
(See Are Southern California coyotes eating 68% fewer cats than 20 years ago?)
Coyotes, however, are no more going hungry than are leopards or jaguars. As the feral cat population diminishes, urban coyote prey including rats, rabbits, and opossums are increasing, while nonmigratory Canada geese and their eggs are as abundant as ever.
Please donate to help our work:
www.animals24-7.org/donate
Discover more from Animals 24-7
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
















