
Former keeper Ing-Marie Persson with the Furuvik Zoo chimps.
Shootings, as info emerges, look more like panic than a safety precaution
GAVLE, Sweden––The more information emerges about the December 14, 2022 fatal shooting of four chimpanzees and wounding of another at the Furuvik Zoo, about 100 miles north of Stockholm, the Swedish capital city, the more the shootings look like an ill-informed panic response by management who did not even consult experts familiar with both the chimps and the zoo facilities before opening fire.
Initial reports about the “mass escape” of five chimps in all neglected to mention––because reporters were not allowed near the scene––that the chimps never left the Furuvik Zoo premises, may never have left the securely locked winter quarters that they shared with many other animals, and indeed were never far from their cages, despite getting out of the chimpanzee exhibit.

Visitor map of the Furuvik Zoo.
Closed for the winter
Further, the Furuvik Zoo itself had already closed for the winter, with a considerable buffer zone of empty cages, walkways, and perimeter fencing between the chimps and most avenues of access to the community, even if they had managed to batter their way through the exterior doors.
The chimps were in the Regnskogen, or rainforest exhibit, which backs up to the Furuvik Zoo perimeter fencing on the west side, but escaping in that direction, through deep snow in temperatures of -27 degrees Fahrenheit, five degrees centigrade, would not have attracted even chimps long housed in Sweden.
Finally, the entire vicinity was reportedly under continuous surveillance by police drones.

Santino, Manda, Torsten & Linda.
(Beth Clifton collage)
Why did the zoo not use a tranquilizer gun?
Acknowledging “a failure on our part” leading to the shooting of the chimpanzees Linda, Manda, Santino, and Torsten,” the Furuvik zoo management said the chimps “first got out of their enclosure and then also out of the chimpanzee house.”
The chimps were not shot with tranquilizer darts, the Furuvik zoo management continued, because “You have to be sure to hit the chimpanzee’s muscle.”
After that, “It can take a long time, between 10 and 20 minutes, for the tranquilizer to work. During that time, the chimpanzee continues to pose a danger to humans.”
All true.
But Furuvik Zoo spokesperson Annika Troselius earlier told the daily newspaper Dagens Nyheter and TV-4 that the chimps were shot, rather than tranquilized, because the zoo did not have enough tranquilizer on hand to dart all of them.
Chimps running around in snow & sub-zero weather?
Under that circumstance, darting the leader or leaders would have been one time-tested strategy, leaving the rest to be tranquilized as necessary by pills hidden in food rewards.
Of course unconscious chimpanzees could not be left outdoors for long in the extreme cold––but that factor alone suggests the chimps would soon have returned voluntarily to their exhibit, if allowed to do so, with the tranquilizer dart or darts on hand held in reserve to intercept the first chimp to try to leave the zoo, and gunfire kept as a last recourse if the tranquilizer failed and/or other chimps tried to make a jailbreak.
The youngest chimp shot, Torsten, was only three years old.
“But a young chimpanzee can be as strong as an adult human,” the zoo said, “and can thus also pose a danger to humans.”

Cotton-top tamarin.
(Beth Clifton collage)
Killed some other animals, but left the monkeys alone
The chimpanzees, while loose in the rainforest exhibit, allegedly killed six crustaceans, two tarantulas, and “a number of fish,” possibly to eat, while a turtle “had to be euthanized due to bite injuries from a chimp,” the Furuvik Zoo said.
Left unharmed, though chimps are known to eat small monkeys and reptiles, were several cotton-headed tamarins, golden-capped lion tamarins, pygmy marmosets, and a variety of snakes and iguanas.
The three surviving chimps, Maria-Magdalena, Tjobbe, and Selma, who retreated to her cage after being shot, are receiving “food, drink, , and medication and are kept under close supervision by animal keepers and veterinarians,” the Furuvik Zoo statement finished.
Selma reportedly suffered wounds to one arm and to her eye.
“She has started to move her arm and fingers, and the swelling of her eye has reduced,” the Furuvik Zoo posted to social media.

Ing-Marie Persson with Manda as a young chimp.
35-year primate keeper offered to help, was ignored
Former Furuvik Zoo primate keeper Ing-Marie Persson pronounced herself “pissed off” to the newspaper Afton Bladet at what she termed an “unprofessional and incredibly incompetent” response from the zoo, then elaborated at length on Facebook.
Ing-Marie Persson, after 35 years as primate keeper, and her husband, former Furuvik Zoo manager Johnny Persson, retired “10 years ago because of a change of ownership,” she explained.
“I had a unique relationship with these chimpanzees,” Persson continued, “who even in our time managed to get out of the facility,” but then “It was solved without a problem,” Persson said.

Selma, the chimp who was wounded but survived, as a young chimp.
“I could take them by the hand”
“Of course, my relationship made it easier,” Persson said, “as I could take them by the hand and go back inside. I offered my services immediately, but they refused to acknowledge [the offer]. I live 20 minutes from the zoo.
“I will now dedicate my life to finding out what happened and bringing justice to my dead friends!” Persson pledged.
“Their excuse is that they don’t work with the animals the way I did. The chimpanzee group was changed. What does it matter how you work now? A 3-year-old baby [Torsten] was by Linda’s side. Linda was like a ‘daughter’ to me. What threat the little one would pose?
“Then there was an adult male that I didn’t know,” Persson acknowledged. “But the others were my closest friends. All of you who know chimpanzees know that they never forget.”

Ing-Marie Persson with Santino.
Frans de Waal
Persson posted to Facebook after Dutch primatologist and ethologist Frans de Waal offered his perspective, from personal acquaintance with several of the chimps who were killed, and as holder of the Charles Howard Candler chair as professor of primate behavior in the psychology department at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.
“I myself have been among escaped chimpanzees multiple times,” de Waal testified, “and they are almost never in an aggressive mood. They seem lost and hesitant outside their territory, and are usually eager to return to where they came from.
“I have seen animal caretakers take them by the hand to lead them back,” as Persson said she did.
“I am not saying that there is no danger,” de Waal said, “but nowadays many zoos show outsized panic.

Frans de Waal.
“Shooting should be the last resort”
“The procedure should be as follows, de Waal enumerated. “First, watch the escaped apes to see in what kind of mood they are. Most of the time they are just curiously walking about.
“Second, if aggressive, you may need to dart them with a tranquilizer.”
Otherwise, de Waal said, “bring in people they know and trust. This is usually not the veterinarian, and most certainly not hunters or police. Bring in animal caretakers whom they know, who will often be able to lead or lure them back.
“Shooting should always be the last resort.”
Noted de Waal, “Among the chimpanzees killed was Santino, 45, who became famous for giving a clear demonstration of planning for the future by apes, which was studied and written up by Mathias Osvath in Current Biology (www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(09)00547-8.pdf).

Torsten.
“Horrendous & unnecessary”
“The killing of these apes,” de Waal concluded, “was horrendous and unnecessary. The Furuvik Zoo argues that Torsten, the three-year-old male chimp, was shot because he posed a severe danger to the public. Is this truly their opinion?
“A three-year old chimp is a mere baby,” de Waal explained. “If you meet one alone, take it in your arms, it needs to be held, and will only bite if you try to restrain it, not if you’re nice and gentle. It is totally harmless. Shooting such a little ape for self-protection is one of the silliest ideas I have ever heard, equivalent to shooting a human toddler.”
“If I’d met them in the park,” said Osvath to BBC reporters, “my pulse would have risen, but I wouldn’t have been afraid for my life.

Furuvik Zoo entrance.
“I knew them personally”
“I knew them personally, I would say,” Osvath continued. “I’ve hugged Manda, I’ve kissed Linda, and I’ve had tugs of war with Santino.”
Added Osvath to CBC As It Happens host Nil Köksal, “They shot a three-year-old chimpanzee [Torsten], and a three-year-old chimpanzee [does] not pose any lethal threat whatsoever, but still, they thought it did, which shows to me that they might not have the right competence.”
Osvath noted that Linda, Torsten’s mother, was believed to be between six and nine years of age when Swedish diplomats rescued her from poachers in Liberia, after her mother was shot for bushmeat.
“The irony is that Linda got shot in Sweden, with a juvenile on her back,” Osvath said.

Mathias Osvath, primatologist.
Second thoughts
Osvath, added Mehek Mazhar of CBC, is “having second thoughts about his own research, as head of the Cognitive Zoology Group at Lund University, the university’s long-running research partner with the zoo. That collaboration was put on hold in the aftermath of the shooting.
Santino, according to the Furuvik Zoo page on Facebook, “was known for being playful, friendly and calm. He threw stones at humans, just like other chimps, but what researchers found remarkable was how he strategically stockpiled them.”
This is the behavior that Osvath observed in his landmark 2009 study.

Santino the infamous rock collector, rock thrower and painter. (Furuvik Zoo photo)
“Everybody must get stoned”
Summarized Associated Press writer Malin Rising, “Santino the chimpanzee’s anti-social behavior stunned both visitors and keepers at the Furuvik Zoo, but fascinated researchers because it was so carefully prepared. The 31-year-old alpha male started building his weapons cache in the morning before the zoo opened, collecting rocks and knocking out disks from concrete boulders inside his enclosure. He waited until around midday before he unleashed a ‘hailstorm’ of rocks against visitors, the study said.
Explained Osvath, then a Lund University Ph.D. student, “These observations convincingly show that our fellow apes consider the future in a very complex way. It implies that they have a highly developed consciousness, including lifelike mental simulations of potential events.”
The stone-throwing behavior had been observed by Osvath and keepers for ten years.
Santino “rarely hit visitors because of his poor aim, and no one was seriously injured in the cases when he did,” Osvath told Associated Press writer Rising.

Buck Brogoitti. (Beth Clifton collage)
Comparable incidents
The Furuvik Zoo chimp escape and shootings evoked recollection of the January 20, 2021 shooting of Buck the chimp by Umatilla County sheriff’s deputies at the former Buck Brogoitti Animal Rescue just outside Pendleton, Oregon; the 2009 near-fatal mauling of Charla Nash by a privately owned chimp in Stamford, Connecticut; and the March 3, 2005 near-fatal mauling of former racing car driver St. James Davis by two chimps at the former Animal Haven Ranch sanctuary near Los Angeles.
(See Sheriffs ignored chimp in their own back yard until they shot him.)
But the incident probably uppermost in the minds of Furuvik Zoo management was most likely the September 27, 2020 ambush attack by Malabo, a 380-pound western lowland gorilla, on a 46-year-old female keeper at the Zoo Aquarium de Madrid, in the capital city of Spain.
The keeper suffered multiple fractures, head and chest trauma, and compound fractures of both arms.
Both the Furuvik Zoo and the Zoo Aquarium de Madrid are members of the European Association of Zoos & Aquariums.
(See Gorilla attack just latest episode in 246 years of Zoo de Madrid infamy.)

Harambe swings the fallen four-year-old, from video by Kim O’Connor.
Harambe
Also relatively fresh in mind might have been the shooting of the male silverback gorilla Harambe at the Cincinnati Zoo on May 28, 2016, after a four-year-old boy fell into a the moat surrounding an obsolescent exhibit that was already slated for replacement, and has since been replaced.
Descending into the moat after the boy, Harambe until shot repeatedly swung the boy by the heels, his head within inches of slamming into the concrete walls.
(See The myth & mystery of Harambe the Cincinnati Zoo gorilla, Part I, Myth: that the gorilla Harambe “protected” fallen four-year-old, Conclusion: what the life & death of Harambe the gorilla means, and The lesson from Harambe’s death is? Well, it’s not to blame mom.)

Andrew Oberle.
(Facebook photo)
Jane Goodall Institute throws stones from glass house
The Jane Goodall Institute was, like de Waal, quick to denounce the Furuvik Zoo chimpanzee shootings, but from a much less credible position, since many of the most horrific documented chimp attacks on humans have occurred at Goodall facilities.
The most recent may have been the June 28, 2012 mauling of U.S. anthropology student Andrew Oberle, 26, by two chimpanzees named Nikki and Amadeus at the Jane Goodall Institute Chimpanzee Eden in Mpumalanga, South Africa.
Oberle lost an ear, several fingers and toes and a testicle. Placed in a medically induced coma due to blood loss, Oberle underwent six hours of surgery five days after the attack.
(See Buffalo attack death mystery recalls injuries & deaths of other animal advocates.)
Jane Goodall Institute sanctuaries already had a notoriously bad safety record.

Background: Jane Goodall with Frodo. Foreground: Frodo as infant.
(Beth Clifton collage)
Frodo
For instance, Outside magazine writer Elizabeth Royte and Gombe Stream National Park [Tanzania] director of chimp research Shadrack Kamenya, writing for Pan Africa News, in late 2002 described a May 2002 incident in which a chimp named Frodo accosted the wife and 16-year-old niece of Gombe park attendant Moshi Sadique.
The niece was carrying Sadique’s 14-month-old daughter.
Frodo, who had already attacked and beaten Jane Goodall herself in 1989, among many other previous violent incidents, tore the child away, beat her to death against a tree, disemboweled her, and was eating her brain by the time guards arrived.
Frodo, never punished for the killing, reportedly died of natural causes in 2014, at age 43.

Beth & Merritt Clifton
Similar incidents reportedly occurred at Gombe in 1984, 1987, and in the 1950s.
In 2003 two Goodall Institute chimps escaped from quarantine at the Entebbe Airport in Uganda. One of them “bit off the fingers and toes of his keeper,” according to Gerald Tenywa of the New Vision newspaper in Kampala.
At large for 12 days, the chimps were eventually shot by a posse of Uganda Wildlife Authority rangers, police, and private security guards.
Sharing, with gratitude and reflecting that many activists oppose zoos, for some very valid reasons.
Agree. Those chimps (and others) definitely did not belong to wintry European ecotypes, natural or artificial. The unbridled arrogance of Homo sapiens has led to the avoidable murder of African chimpanzees far away from their true habitats.
“Frodo, never punished for the killing …”
Really. Now we should be “punishing” captive wild animals for insubordinate behavior? What would be appropriate: solitary confinement in the cooler for 30 days? waterboarding?
All wild animals, from elephants to field mice, are potentially dangerous to humans — that’s why they’re called “wild.” Punishing them for following their natural instincts and proclivities would be like punishing a river because some swimmer drowned in it.
Irrespective, this Swedish Zoo sounds like it is run by The Three Stooges and ought to be shut down. So should a majority of the exhibits in most of the zoos of the US. Only those that appropriately house rehabilitated but non-releasable native wildlife should be permitted. Lord knows there would be a flood of specimens to choose from. The animals would benefit from some semblance of a life and the visitors could see how most of the inmates are there because of human-caused injury.
The Jane Goodall Foundation, from Jane Goodall herself on down, maintained the pretense that Frodo was a wild animal while keeping him in close proximity to unprotected staff––much like a pet dog. Any animal who is going to live among humans needs to be capable of learning how to behave appropriately. Probably Frodo could not have been trained successfully, but most animals who live among humans learn very early and easily what inappropriate behavior is, well short of killing a baby and eating her brains. There are of course exceptions, notably among “pet” chimpanzees, big cats, and pit bulls. But this is precisely why these animals should not be kept as pets.
I did not read the entire article, but if it is like most things, animals are killed without any cause. If a zoo or sanctuary cannot do the very best for animals, leave them in their natural habitat. Killing is too easy an answer. We don’t deserve animals. Their lives have so little meaning to us, but to them, it is just as sacred as our lives are to us. Every time I hear of something like what happened here, I am sickened. Don’t get animals unless their welfare is as important to you as their lives are to them. There has been far too much killing and nothing has been learned–shame!
Of the five chimpanzees shot at the Furuvik Zoo, four were born in captivity. Only one, Linda, had any experience in her natural habitat; she came into captivity when rescued at about age six from poachers who had already killed her mother.
Zoos should be abolished. No animal should have to live as an “exhibit” or a “specimen” of its kind. Zoos should transform themselves into places where people walk through vibrant walls and ceilings filled with animated replicas of the forests and fields and skies in which free-living animals evolved and have every right to exist, autonomously and naturally. These animated worlds should be filled with animals who belong in the replicated natural habitats. We have no business forcing other animals into captivity — for entertainment pretending to be educational. And as one commenter to this article said, how dare we talk about PUNISHING our victims for acting out their hatred of the captivity from which they cannot escape. Visitors learn nothing significant about “zoo” animals except how a captive “zoo” animal behaves. These quickie visits are forgotten by most zoo visitors as soon as they get hungry, and their children are screaming to go to MacDonald’s.
If captive animals attack their prison guards, the keepers and everyone responsible for the captivity asked for it. But, of course, the real criminals get away with murder, and the victims are “punished” for lashing out at their captors. How little zookeepers and other such authorities care about nonhuman animal species and individuals is shown by how quickly they reach for a gun to kill preemptively. If only the entire Animal Kingdom could successfully fight back against us, and free themselves and their own children from our chains and weapons of assault, but, alas, they are our prisoners on Earth which we are transforming into an abandoned Planetary Prison and Extermination Camp for the rest of the living world.
Karen Davis, PhD, President, United Poultry Concerns. http://www.upc-online.org
Karen Davis, like “Geoff,” the preceding commenter with whom she agrees, should pay attention to what she is talking about before popping off.
The Gombe research station in Tanzania, run by the Jane Goodall Foundation, is NOT a zoo, nor anything like a zoo. Frodo, the chimp who killed a baby, was a fully wild adult male chimpanzee, whom Jane Goodall personally had habituated and had encouraged to visit the compound where staff lived and worked, with the understanding that they were safe in what was supposed to be their own confined and restricted habitat, and that any animals allowed inside would be no more dangerous than a dog to be around.
Frodo’s victims––a female staff member, a 14-year-old girl, and the infant he killed––were in no way “prison guards.”
Neither was the female staff member who was ambushed by Malabo, the Madrid Zoo gorilla, in any way a “prison guard.” She was there to prepare Malabo’s morning meal, in a part of his quarters to which Malabo normally had no access, and had broken into without her knowledge.
Whether the victim is an animal abused by a human, or a human attacked by an animal, victim-blaming is unacceptable to ANIMALS 24-7.
The remainder of Davis’ comment is equally ill-informed. Very few animals in zoos today, 50 years after the adoption of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species largely ended the era of animal capture from the wild for exhibit, have ever had any experience of living anywhere else. The few zoo animals who have come from the wild these days are primarily rescue cases, like the chimp Linda at the Furuvik Zoo who was confiscated from poachers, or were habituated animals who had become dangerous and would otherwise have been shot, like practically every polar bear, brown bear, and black bear on exhibit anywhere.
Accredited zoos in North America, Europe, and Asia, have been making multi-million-dollar efforts for more than 35 years to entertain and educate visitors with electronic simulations of wild animals and habitat, beginning with wrap-around screen productions and animatronics, advancing up to very realistic three-dimensional projections through headsets, but the novelty of more sophisticated versions of what can be seen at home on television has never for long replaced the experience of actually observing and sometimes interacting to a limited extent with live animals.
Nor will it, nor can it. If it could, people of adequate financial means and physical ability would not be trekking into wildlife habitat by the millions each year just to catch a fleeting glimpse of species easily and abundantly seen at the push of a button.
Incidentally, except on summer weekends, children are relatively rarely seen at zoos these days. The majority of visitors the rest of the time are adults, often retirees, who like to see animals on a quiet walkabout, and mostly live in places where this is not easily done from home.
Finally, Beth and I both learned quite a lot from, and still vividly remember, our own first visits to zoos as small children many decades ago. Zoos then were far drearier and much more oppressive places for the animals than they are today, but the animals themselves often seemed wonderful and magical, and their interactions with us had much to do with the directions of the rest of our lives.
So, how exactly would YOU handle the “Frodo” episode? Are we talking about eye-for-an-eye style of justice here?
Practically every wildlife rehabilitation and wildlife management professional of the past several hundred years has advised against allowing wild animals to become habituated to associating with humans. Jane Goodall, in allowing and indeed encouraging Frodo to become habituated, directly contradicted advice she was given from several other professionals who were experienced with chimpanzees, both in wild and domesticated situations.
Once a potentially dangerous wild animal has become habituated to human contact, relocating the animal has had some success where practicable, but has been more successful with large herbivores, for example elephants, than with large omnivores and carnivores, and all large species tend to return to the home ranges within which they have been problematic.
That leaves only two options in most cases: life imprisonment in a zoo or securely fenced sanctuary, or the death penalty, usually by shooting the animal.
In Frodo’s case, he was already a “three strikes” offender, for having killed and injured other chimps without provocation, in atypical deviation from normal chimp behavior, violent as it often is, and for having injured Jane Goodall, who habituated him in the first place.
In this particular case, I’d have to agree with you entirely.