(Beth Clifton collage)
New British study confirms frequency of injuries to intervenors in pit bull attacks on other dogs
GARNER, North Carolina; GLOUCESTER, U.K.––Did Jayden Belle Henderson, age seven, die trying to stop a dogfight?
Two pit bulls on April 27, 2021 killed Henderson and severely mauled her mother, WRAL television master controller Heather Travaskis, 39.
Trevaskis, now hospitalized in reportedly stable condition with multiple severe injuries to her hands and arms, may eventually shed light on exactly what happened.
What is known for now, according to local news reports, is only that Henderson and Travaskis were helping to look after the two pit bulls for unidentified owners who were out of town.
(Beth Clifton collage)
Killer pit allegedly rehomed by Wake County Animal Shelter
The pit bulls, ironically, were readily identified.
Athena, a female, was adopted in December 2019, according to social media postings, apparently after impoundment by the Wake County Animal Shelter.
Subsequent to that impoundment, Athena became the 52nd pit bull rehomed by a U.S. animal shelter known to have participated in killing someone since the April 2007 arrest of football player Michael Vick made rehoming pit bulls fashionable.
Altogether, 72 dogs rehomed by U.S. animal shelters are known to have participated in fatal attacks since April 2007, with 44 human victims.
Only four dogs rehomed by U.S. animal shelters are known to have killed anyone earlier––two wolf hybrids in 1988, and a pit bull and a Doberman, both in 2003.
Athena may have been rehomed through a third party rescue after the Wake County Animal Shelter promoted a “Pit Bull Adoption Special” in October 2019.
Athena, left, & Blitzer, right.
(Instagram photos)
“Emotional Support Animal” & “Service Dog”
Posted photos showed Athena wearing an “Emotional Support Animal” vest.
The second pit bull involved in killing Henderson and mauling her mother, Blitzen, is a neutered male, shown in photos wearing a “Service Dog” vest.
The photos of the pit bulls were identified with hashtags including #pitbullsofinstagram, #dontbullymybreed, #servicedog, #furchild, and #pittienation.
(Beth Clifton collage)
Most common attack scenarios
Possibly Jayden Belle Henderson was killed in an unprovoked pack attack, the second most common scenario in fatal attacks both by pit bulls and by other dogs.
The most common scenario is simply that a pit bull jumps someone vulnerable, usually a child or an elderly person.
Trying to stop a pit bull, specifically, from attacking another animal is perhaps the third most common scenario in fatal attacks, but usually the attack occurs in the victim’s home, without witnesses.
Security cameras, meanwhile, are increasingly often confirming that both fatal and disfiguring pit bull attacks on humans frequently originate as attacks on another animal––sometimes another pit bull, but usually a smaller dog, sometimes a cat or other pet.
When the human victim intervenes, the pit bull or several pit bulls turn on the human as well.
(Beth Clifton collage)
“Dog bites dog”
ANIMALS 24-7, documenting and quantifying dog attacks on other animals since calendar year 2013, annually posting the data since 2014, was already at work on an update about dog attacks on other dogs when word of Jayden Belle Henderson’s death arrived.
Seven years after ANIMALS 24-7 first shared our findings, our observations are now independently confirmed by a study of British data published by the Journal of Veterinary Behavior, a Dutch study compiled from police reports, and a reappraisal of the data from both studies by Dogsbite.org.
Evolutionary biologist V. Tamara Montrose and four colleagues produced the Journal of Veterinary Behavior study, entitled “Dog bites dog: The use of news media articles to investigate dog on dog aggression.”
(Beth Clifton photo/ collage)
“Common behavioral problem”
Opened Montrose et al, “Dog on dog aggression is a common behavioral problem and has the potential to result in dog and/or human injury, the need for veterinary treatment, and financial and legal repercussions. Despite this, few studies of dog on dog aggression have occurred. News reports of dog on dog aggression provide a method of understanding the demographics of these attacks.”
Montrose and colleagues collected, they explained, 151 “national and local news articles [describing dog attacks on other dogs] between September 2016 and February 2020 identified through Yahoo and Google.”
The Montrose et al approach was similar to the approach used by ANIMALS 24-7, except that our sweep of news reports is much broader, and we had already been logging fatal and disfiguring dog attacks on humans since 1982, when in 2013 we began adding to our collection and analysis the data on from 300 to 400 dog attacks on other animals per year..
The United Kingdom banned pit bulls in 1991 but not Staffordshires, another name for the same dog.
“Most reported attacking breed” was pit bull
Summarized Montrose et al, “In the majority of these attacks, one dog initiated the attack and this dog tended to be a medium sized breed and off-leash. The most reported attacking breed was the Staffordshire bull terrier,” perhaps the most common variety of pit bull, though exempted from the definition of pit bull included in the British “Dangerous Dogs Act 1991.”
(See Dog attacks surge 76% in England in 10 years, coinciding with exemption of Staffordshire pit bulls from the Dangerous Dogs Act and New U.K. death exemplifies pit bull advocacy chutzpah.)
“The owner intervened in just under half of cases and often suffered injuries defending their dog,” Montrose et al confirmed.
(Beth Clifton collage)
Reported attacks occur mostly in public space
“All incidents of dog-on-dog aggression occurred in a public space, such as a park or street,” Montrose et al continued, confirming the ANIMALS 24-7 observation that dog-on-dog attacks occurring within the owner’s home and involving only animals kept by the same family are rarely reported, unless a person is also injured or killed and/or police shoot the attacking dog.
Altogether, 188 dogs were among the attackers, of whom 155 were identified by breed. Forty-eight of those dogs were reported to be Staffordshire bull terriers; 76 were pit bulls according to U.S. definitions stated in law.
59% of the attacking dogs were not on a lead, Montrose et al found, while in 30% of the attacks “whether the attacking dog was restrained was unknown.
(Beth Clifton collage)
Owners of attacking dogs “intervened 19% of the time”
“The owner/caregiver of the attacking dog intervened 19% of the time,” continued Montrose et al. In 35% [of the] cases, the owner/caregiver did not intervene,” with intervention by the owner or caregiver of the attacking dog not reported in another 48% of the incidents.
At least 19% of the victim dogs were on a lead when attacked; 29% were not, Montrose et al reported.
The victim dogs required veterinary care after 70% of the attacks considered by Montrose et al.
(The ANIMALS 24-7 data on dog-vs.-other animal attacks does not include incidents in which the victim animal was neither killed nor required veterinary care.)
“The owner/caregiver of the victim was present during the incident in 144 (95.4%) out of 151 reported incidents,” Montrose et al found. “In 74 (49.0%) incidents, the owner of the victim intervened.
(Beth Clifton collage)
Owners of attacked dogs were injured in more than a third of incidents
“In 54 (35.8%) incidents, owners of the attacked dogs stated that they had suffered some form of physical or psychological injury. The majority of injuries (63%) occurred to the hands or hands and other parts of the body.
“In 129 incidents of 151 (85.4%), the incident was reported to the police,” Montrose et al said.
“Although a range of breeds were reported, in one quarter of cases, the attack was described as being carried out by a Staffordshire bull terrier,” Montrose et al noted. “This result is similar to Schilder et a., (2019) who found that over half of dogs seized by authorities in the Netherlands for killing or severely wounding other dogs were American Staffordshire and pit bull terrier types.”
ANIMALS 24-7 has found that 87% of the dogs killed by other dogs––an average of 9,800 per year since 2013––have been pit bulls, including Staffordshires.
Pit bulls, since 1982, have also inflicted 61% of all dog attack fatalities on humans in the U.S. and Canada (526 of 864), and 76% of all disfiguring dog attacks on humans (5,112 of 6,770).
(Beth Clifton collage)
Montrose et al shy away from own findings
Unfortunately, instead of facing up to the reality documented by their own study, Montrose et al concluded with a 270-word disclaimer postulating––without providing a scrap of supporting evidence––that possibly the owners of dogs attacked by “Staffordshires” failed to distinguish them from “pit bulls,” though they are in truth exactly the same dogs everywhere except under the “Dangerous Dogs Act 1991,” or that “Staffordshires” are victims of “media bias,” resulting in “Staffordshire” attacks being reported by news media when similar attacks by other dogs might not be.
ANIMALS 24-7 has found, and repeatedly confirmed, that dog-on-dog attacks involving pit bulls are actually disproportionally likely to not be reported, either to police, animal control, or news media, since attacks occurring within a household are rarely reported.
This is actually what Montrose et al found, if the Montrose team and the Journal of Veterinary Behavior had the integrity to report only documented findings, instead of reciting the tropes of pit bull advocacy.
(Beth Clifton collage)
Hiding the obvious
The Schilder et al study, done from Dutch police reports, found that 72 of 128 dogs impounded for attacking other dogs were pit bulls, who killed 38 other dogs and severely injured 42 other dogs.
Charged Dogsbite.org on March 11, 2021, after applying the U.S. legal definitions of “pit bull” to the British and Dutch data, finding that Montrose et al significantly understated the frequency of pit bull attacks on other dogs by failing to recognize Staffordshires as pit bulls,
Merritt, Teddy, & Beth Clifton.
“The glaring absence of data about the most common type of dog attack in the US, dog-on-dog attacks, is the direct result of multi-million dollar humane and veterinary organizations refusing to collect data or to investigate this area of damaging attacks. They don’t want the public to know the self-evident results: fighting breeds are largely responsible.”
Please donate to help support our work:
www.animals24-7.org/donate/
Related Posts
Three pit bull-related deaths in three days ended April 2021
Is “green building” better for wildlife?
Diane Whipple died for the sins of dangerous dog advocacy
What was No Kill Nation founder Debi Day doing in Charlottesville?
Birds in the mail: U.S. Postal Service changes kill thousands
“End human breeding of animals,” says Ed Duvin; ANIMALS 24-7 responds
It really shouldn’t take an advanced degree to figure out the logic here. If these unpredictable, very often extremely violent WMDs were put down upon intake, these senseless maimings and killings would not be occurring in the first place. Sharing to socials, with gratitude…
#pitbullsofinstagram, #dontbullymybreed, #servicedog, #furchild, and #pittienation
I’m glad to see you using those hashtags in stories like this. I hope DogsBite.org, National Pit Bull Victim Awareness, and all of the others speaking up about this problem use those hashtags in every story they publish about human and animal deaths and maulings by pit bulls. We are not as well-funded but have right on our side and I sincerely hope that we have the ability to bend the arc.
I wanted to correct one of the photo captions: “The United Kingdom banned pit bulls in 1991 but not Staffordshires, another name for the same dog.”
Those are actually different breeds. It is the American Staffordshire Terrier and the American Pit Bull Terrier that are the same breed. The same dog can be registered in the AKC and UKC using these names; each name used by only one of the registries.
The Staffordshire Bull Terrier is a much smaller breed that was the original “bulldog / fighting dog” established 500+ years ago in the UK.
There never ever was any such thing as a “Staffordshire,” bull terrier or otherwise, who was not a pit bull.
The term “Staffordshire” does not appear among the descriptions of dog breeds given by Lieutenant Colonel Charles Hamilton Smith in The Natural History of Dogs. Published in 1839-1840 by W.H. Lazars of Edinburgh, Scotland, this was the book that formed the basis for describing the original pedigrees recognized by The Kennel Club.
Neither is “Staffordshire” to be found as a dog breed description among any of the thousands of pages of 19th & early 20th century U.K. newspapers accessible at http://www.newspaperarchive.com.
The U.K. public have been persuaded in the post-World War II era that “Staffordshire” is a domestic British breed of ancient lineage, but reality (as ANIMALS 24-7 has often explained) is that the “Staffordshire” name was first used to describe a breed of dog by the Massachusetts pit bull breeder John P. Colby in 1935.
Colby used “Staffordshire” to disguise the culled fighting dog pups he sold for pets. His wife formed the Staffordshire Club of America to give those dogs pedigrees. This ploy enabled “Staffordshires” to be shown in American Kennel Club shows, whereas the same dogs, as pit bulls, had been excluded as “mutts.”
The misconception that a “Staffordshire” is, or ever was, something other than a pit bull is what underlies the failure of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 to protect the British public.
There is, further, no such thing as a bull terrier of any sort who is not a pit bull, the origin of pit bulls having been in bull-baiting. Nor is there any pit bull or bull terrier variant that is demonstrably less dangerous than any other, as the mountains of data we have collected on more than 10,000 fatal and disfiguring dog attacks in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., India and South Africa since 1982 more than amply demonstrates.
How were the fighting breeds referred to in The Natural History of Dogs book? Bull Terriers?
Lieutenant Colonel Charles Hamilton Smith, author of The Natural History of Dogs, published in 1839-1840 by W.H. Lizars of Edinburgh, Scotland, wrote, describing the dog now most often called a pit bull: “The bull-dog differs from all others, even from the mastiff, in giving no warning of his attack by his barking. He grapples his opponents without in the least estimating their comparative weight and powers. The bull-dog is possessed of less sagacity and less attachment than any of the hound tribe; he is therefore less favored, and more rarely bred with care, excepting by professed amateurs of sports and feelings little commendable to humanity. He never leaves his hold, when once he has got it, while life lasts.”
Thank you for that excerpt! The pro-pit propaganda had gotten to me to the point where I went and looked up the Staffordshire BT on The Kennel Clubs’ website since I was sure they had been nannying since dogs had existed.
Recently when walking my 9.2 lb. Chihuahua an unleashed pit bull came rushing out and grabbed him in its mouth. I was walking with a cane due to sciatica and after a few whacks and yelling it released my dog that was screaming. Two young children appeared yelling at the dog and grabbed it by the collar. Fortunately my dog did not suffer any injuries. I was later told by a neighbor that the owners of the property always have the dog off leash. This was the fourth pit bull attack in the fifteen years I have had my dog, two attacks by the same dog. When I posted the incident on Facebook people immediately came to the defense of the pit bull, blame the human, not the dog. But blaming the human does not change the statistics of the high percentage of pit bull attacks that are responsible for over 80% of fatalities of other animals. I always carry a mace gun but in this incidence the attack happened so quickly I did not have time to take it out and I would have maced my own dog. Dogs are predatory animals and some breeds have greater predatory instincts. The larger the dog with predatory instincts the greater the chance of serious injury or death.
If your tiny dog gets mauled by an out of control unleashed pit, the idea of blame becomes meaningless.. I hope that dog gets a dirt nap and/or you can find a safer place to walk. I hope you called animal control. Not that they would DO anything….I am glad your dog is OK.