• News home
  • About us
  • Our bios
  • Contact us
  • Cats
  • Disasters
  • Pit bull data
  • How to help us
  • Follow us!

Animals 24-7

News on dogs, cats, horses, wildlife, zoonoses, & nature

  • USA
  • Asia/Pacific
  • Africa
  • The Americas
  • Europe
  • Obituaries
  • Please donate!
  • Search this site

Pit bull advocacy exposed by the CBC Fifth Estate with host Mark Kelley

September 23, 2017 By Merritt Clifton

Top right: Jeff Borchardt. Bottom left: Mark Kelley. Bottom right: Ledy Van Kavage.
(Beth Clifton collage)

Pit Bulls Unleashed:  Should They Be Banned?

The Fifth Estate with Mark Kelley

http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/ or

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCa-bX3gZC3YnCThlGM5d38Q

 

Pit bull advocates have been screaming bloody murder since the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation last night,  September  22,  2017,  aired Pit Bulls Unleashed:  Should They Be Banned?

Ledy Van Kavage and her “American bully” pit bull.  (From Fifth Estate video)

The hour-long documentary,  produced by the investigative news magazine program The Fifth Estate,  the Canadian counterpart of the CBS news series 60 Minutes,  amounts to the first major mass media exposé ever of what host Mark Kelley sums up as “a multi-million-dollar lobbying effort to rebrand the pit bull as a family-friendly dog so that more will be adopted out.”

“Why do pit bulls need lobbying?”

The focal question,  asked repeatedly by Kelley of Best Friends Animal Society pit bull lobbyist Ledy van Kavage,  is “Why do pit bulls need  lobbying?  Why do they need an organization?  Why do they need a network fighting for them?”

Cornered,  Van Kavage describes the ever-escalating numbers of fatal and disfiguring pit bull attacks as “fake news,”  then cackles nervous laughter as Kelley sets in front of her print-out after print-out of accounts of very recent pit bull incidents.

“I don’t know if the child was crying”

Asked specifically about the death of 14-month-old Daxton Borchardt in March 2013,  torn from the arms of babysitter Susan Iwicki and killed by two pit bulls familiar to both of them,  hand-raised by Iwicki from puppyhood,  Van Kavage intimated that perhaps the attack occurred because the child was crying.

“I don’t know if the child was crying,”  Van Kavage said.

Kelley’s look of incredulity that anyone might suggest a dog who kills a baby for crying is nonetheless a safe dog for children says about all that need be said,  except to note that Van Kavage herself has no children,  just an obese “American bully.”

Thomas Mair (SRUV photo)

A 30-year free pass

In truth,  pit bull advocates,  including Van Kavage and Best Friends,  the pro-pit bull Animal Farm Foundation,  and the subsidiary National Canine Foundation,  have had almost a 30-year free pass from U.S. and Canadian major mass media,  as demonstrated by “SRUV” blogger Thomas Mair in his 2014 Annotated Cultural Bibliography of Pit Bull Journalism.

(See http://sruv-pitbulls.blogspot.com/2014/03/cultural-bibliography.html.)

Between 1985 and 1989,  Mair found,  major mass media responded to the early phase of what is now three decades of exponentially increasing fatal and disfiguring attacks by pit bulls with near-unanimous concern,  including respect for the victims,  both human and animal.

ANIMALS 24-7 was exposing the big lies about pit bulls five years before even Ann Landers.

Ann Landers knew a pit bull from a wet noodle

“Nine deaths in past 18 months blamed on pit bulls,”  banned the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on November 29,  1986,  decrying a toll significantly less than the norm since 2007 of about 45 human deaths by pit bull per 18 months.

In 1987 alone,  Time,  People,  Sports Illustrated,  and the late syndicated advice columnist Ann Landers,  on multiple occasions,  devoted prominent attention to warning the public against pit bull proliferation.

Michael Vick, left, and HSUS president Wayne Pacelle, right. (From HSUS video.)

Cities including Denver and Miami,  the entire state of Ohio,  the New York City Public Housing Authority,  and many other jurisdictions and agencies responded with regulatory action to curb pit bull proliferation––and then neglected enforcement,  while the major mass media who had monitored the growing crisis mostly fell asleep.

Media fell asleep

Twenty years of increasingly well-funded and noisy pit bull advocacy later,  even as the numbers of pit bull-inflicted fatalities and disfigurements exploded,  the April 2007 discovery of a dogfighting operation headed by football star Michael Vick made pushing pit bulls the fashionable cause of the ensuing decade among a generation of click-bait media “content providers” and pop culture celebrities.

Charlotte Alter of TIME featured ANIMALS 24-7 research in June 2014.

These were and are people mostly too young to remember why pit bulls had been banned or restricted throughout much of the U.S. and Canada;  too used to frequent pit bull violence to recognize it as completely uncharacteristic of normal dog behavior;  and too poorly grounded in the traditional ethics of journalism to do the elementary research which would have quickly expose the “Big Lies” of pit bull advocacy.

Examples include the myth that pit bulls were ever “nanny dogs,”  “America’s dog,”  or anything else other than fighting and baiting dogs,  the favorite dogs of the Ku Klux Klan,  runaway slave-killing dogs,  and the dogs set on Native American encampments before the likes of sometime dogfighter George Armstrong Custer closed in to kill whoever was left.

Barbara Kay, interviewed by Mark Kelley.
(From Fifth Estate video)

Two TV judges & three journalists against the pit bull army

Among major mass media during the past 10 years,  only Judge Joe Brown,  Judge Judy,  Charlotte Alter of Time.com,  Barbara Kay of the Canadian National Post, and Marie-Claude Malboeuf of the Montreal-based newspaper La Presse,  published in French,  have stood up against pit bull advocacy.

Except by Alter,  Kay,  and Malboeuf,  advocates for pit bull victims,  both human and animal,  have relatively seldom even been quoted in items pertaining to pit bulls.

Before The Fifth Estate,  and Kay and Malbouef excepted,  no media larger than ANIMALS 24-7 have explored,  exposed,  and refuted the blizzard of bogus “studies,”  false claims, misrepresentation of dog identities,  and the rest of the pit bull lobby bag of tricks––or even looked more than superficially at the reality that most of the celebrities prominently endorsing pit bulls have had their own incidents,  including trainer Cesar Millan.

(See What on earth was Cesar Millan thinking?,  by Beth Clifton.)

Kim & Jeff Borchardt with son Daxton at Christmas 2012.

Original investigation

While the endorsements are amplified by the Best Friends Animal Society,  Humane Society of the U.S.,  American SPCA,  and others,  settlements of victims’ lawsuits costing the celebrities and their insurers tens of thousands of dollars time and again attract only transient notice.

The Fifth Estate has long been known for doing sound investigative research.  The six months or thereabouts of research that went into producing the documentary episode Pit Bulls Unleashed:  Should They Be Banned? were no exception.

Blue, above, killed Margaret Colvin, 90, moments after his shock collar (shown above) was removed by Colvin’s daughter. (See How multi-state effort to save the pit bull Blue led to Code Blue for Margaret Colvin.)  (Facebook photo)

One self-evident starting point for The Fifth Estate investigation of pit bulls was an extensive interview done in 2014 by Dogsbite.org founder Colleen Lynn with Jeff Borchardt,  father of pit bull victim Daxton Borchardt and founder of the victim advocacy organization Daxton’s Friends.  Lynn also interviewed babysitter Iwicki,  who was herself seriously injured while trying to protect Daxton.

Background

Several other self-evident starting points for The Fifth Estate were ANIMALS 24-7 exposes of:

  •  Pit bull trafficking from the U.S. into Canada  (see Rollover crash reignites controversy over dog rescue traffic from U.S. to Canada);
  • The role of the Best Friends Animal Society in promoting pit bull proliferation and eroding legislation meant to protect the public from fatal and disfiguring attacks (see HSUS & Best Friends throw puppy mill pups to pit bulls and Best Friends, the ASPCA, & HSUS: rethink pit bulls!);
  • Our statistical research of the past 35 years (see Three pit bull attack deaths in one day mark 35 years of logging the mayhem);our exposés of how newly rehomed pit bulls of problematic but concealed history went on to disfigure a child in Iowa and kill a 90-year-old woman in New Jersey (see How multi-state effort to save the pit bull Blue led to Code Blue for Margaret Colvin and Anatomy of a disfigurement by a misidentified shelter pit bull);
  • And a brief mention of how many other animals pit bulls kill each year,  most of them beloved pets (see Record 32,550 pit bulls killed or badly injured other animals in the U.S. in 2016.)

Emmet, who recently mauled Lucas Harrison, age 15 months. See Anatomy of a disfigurement by a misidentified shelter pit bull.
(Beth Clifton collage)

But neither Dogsbite.org nor ANIMALS 24-7 is mentioned or credited in Pit Bulls Unleashed:  Should They Be Banned?,  nor should we have been.

Though The Fifth Estate may have followed up the information we had already researched and published,  their own team personally re-investigated every detail.

Months into the work,  after much of the videotaping had already been done,  Fifth Estate producer Lisa Ellenwood contacted us to verify some information,  but this amounted to little more than our forwarding to her some web links and tables.

Disingenuousness

The Fifth Estate on-camera interviews with Van Kavage and a coterie of other pit bull advocates reveal both disingenuousness on the part of those who are paid for it and alarming disregard of precautionary principle on the part of those who are not.

Brandi McNeely (From Fifth Estate video)

Examples include those who take pit bulls into crowded,  busy public places while claiming the dogs are something else,  and young mother Chantal Campau,  who allows two small children barely older than Daxton to swarm over a newly adopted pit bull only minutes after the pit bull––of completely unknown background––has arrived in Calgary after a “rescue” flight from California.

On-camera interviews

The Fifth Estate on-camera interviews with Iwicki,  Jeff Borchardt,  former animal control officer Brandi McNeely,  Emily Vadnais,  daughter of Montreal pit bull victim Christiane Vadnais,  four-year-old British Columbia victim Emily Cranford,  and Trehlan Credit,  who in 2013 had part of his scalp ripped off by a family pit bull in Little Rock,  Arkansas,  are moving and informative.

Michael Golinko, M.D.
(From Fifth Estate video)

Asks Iwicki,  “Who wants to admit even for a second that their family pet could kill one of their family members?”

Plastic surgeon

But perhaps the most influential Fifth Estate source will be Michael Golinko,  M.D.,  now director of plastic surgery at the Arkansas Children’s Hospital in Little Rock,  formerly at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta,  a project of Emory University.

In July 2016 Golinko published Characteristics of 1616 Consecutive Dog Bite Injuries at a Single Institution,  based on his Atlanta experience.  Golinko then followed up with a parallel study of 540 pediatric dog bite injury cases in Arkansas.

Trehlan Credit
(From Fifth Estate video)

Findings

Summarized The Fifth Estate,  “In the two studies [Golinko and colleagues] found incidents involving pit bulls were 2.5 times more likely to involve bites in multiple locations on a child’s body than those involving other dogs.

“The depth and the severity of the bites as well as the number of tissue types injured was also different.

“They found those incidents involving pit bulls could also involve bites that went through bone or ripped off a part of a hand or scalp.

“The Atlanta study also found that if a child required an operation,  50% of the time it was following a pit bull bite.  The Atlanta study and multiple other studies have found that children were bitten by family dogs or dogs known to the family in up to 85 per cent of the cases.”

Montreal pit bull fatality Christiane Vadnais with her daughter Emily.

Golinko favors banning pit bulls outright.

Seat belts & air bags

Says Kelley,  “He remembers when no one wore a seatbelt.  Then seat belts were required. He compares the situation around pit bulls to that.”

“For a little while,”  Golinko recalls,  “there was a little bit of pushback,  but at the end of the day,  you have way less fatalities because of air bags,  because of seat belts.

“I’d much rather be on that side of the argument, advocating for a child’s safety than for the right to own a pretty dangerous animal at the end of the day.”

Text: from correspondence,  mostly from Americans,  received by the Montreal city council while considering the city’s pit bull ban, which is now partially in effect.

Takeaways for Canadians

The takeaways for The Fifth Estate’s mostly Canadian audience are that there is an urgent need for Quebec to pass and enforce the provincial ban on pit bulls now pending in the Quebec National Assembly;  for Ontario to begin seriously enforcing the pit bull ban already in effect there since 2006;  and for the rest of Canada to stop allowing the entire nation to become the dumping ground for pit bulls who have already flunked out of homes in the U.S. for undisclosed reasons.

Jeff Borchardt & Mark Kelley. (From Fifth Estate video)

Takeaway for Americans

A takeway question for concerned U.S. citizens,  raised also after exposés about exports of U.S.-made pesticides such as Compound 1080,  which is banned here,  is why we allow pit bull advocates to export a known threat to public health and safety.

Merritt & Beth Clifton

Please help us continue speaking truth to power: 

http://www.animals24-7.org/donate/

Related Posts

  • Daxton’s Friends, five years after trusted pit bulls killed a toddlerDaxton’s Friends, five years after trusted pit bulls killed a toddler
  • From pit bulls to street dogs, irresponsible advocacy inflames “dog menace”From pit bulls to street dogs, irresponsible advocacy inflames “dog menace”
  • Heather Pingel death protecting child echoes the Daxton Borchardt caseHeather Pingel death protecting child echoes the Daxton Borchardt case
  • Solvang animal advocate “Hurricane” Hazel Mortensen dies at 85Solvang animal advocate “Hurricane” Hazel Mortensen dies at 85
  • Montreal carriage horse trade ends,  after 354 yearsMontreal carriage horse trade ends, after 354 years
  • Michigan hero takes on pit bull advocacy with a song & a trash canMichigan hero takes on pit bull advocacy with a song & a trash can

Share this:

  • Tweet

Related

Filed Under: Culture & Animals, Dogs & Cats, Feature Home Top, Screen industry Tagged With: Brandi McNeely, Charlotte Alter, Christiane Vadnais, Colleen Lynn, Daxton Borchardt, Emily Vadnais, Judge Joe Brown, Judge Judy, Ledy Van Kavage, Mark Kelley, Merritt Clifton, Michael Golinko, Susan Iwicki, Trehlan Credit

Comments

  1. David Allison says

    September 24, 2017 at 12:13 am

    Thrilled to see the Fifth Estate program on pitbulls. Dismayed to see them being shipped wholesale into Canada. Enraged when Ms VanKavage asked if the little boy was crying. The dogs should be banned everywhere . Period. Their supporters, no matter how famous, whether or not they have their own TV show are putting a dog ahead of a human life. They are unable to discriminate between the value of their dog and the life of a child. Their views are odious. Everyone.
    Ban the dogs! Now and forever. Whenever there is an attack, prosecute the owners to the full extent of the law. Kudos for the victims who had the courage to appear on the show.

  2. Jamaka Petzak says

    September 24, 2017 at 12:44 am

    Thanking you as ever for your hard work and sharing to social media, because truth and facts are always in my best interest, as well as that of others.

  3. A. St-Laurent says

    September 24, 2017 at 3:42 am

    I also believe that while neither Animals 24-7 nor Dogsbite were specifically mentioned, it was clearly the precise documentation and data collection that you both have logged for years that provided the bright light Mark Kelley needed to uncover the real story through the obfuscation and deception of the advocacy.

    Collen Lynn’s meticulous documentation at Dogsbite.com of the fatal attack on Dax Borchardt’s was one of the first jolts I got when I started the process of figuring out why the hard evidence wasn’t jiving with the familiar narrative of the unfairly stigmatized pit bull. It shook me to the core, so I’m not surprised that he elected to feature Dax’s story prominently. Even now, every time a pit bull booster starts on the “it’s such a small percentage of them that attack and when they do it’s the owner’s fault” line, I can’t breathe for a moment as I recall every harrowing detail of that story seemingly at once — including the advocacy’s ugly part in it.

    Kelley has always had an uncanny ability to get interview subjects comfortable enough let down their guard, and I can’t think when I last saw the ability to simply get people to speak freely used to such devastating effect. He gave them enough rope to, as the saying goes, hang themselves. (They tied it to the chandelier themselves, though.)

    Incidentally, I saw a crystal-clear hat tip to you, personally, with the inclusion of the number of attacks on other dogs and cats, and that disturbing home security camera footage of two pit bulls’ attack on a cat. People really don’t “get” the SRUV aspect of pit bull attacks unless they actually see one, so I’m glad he included it. It’s a brief clip with no sound or narration, and you see the attack from the beginning, so there’s no question of adulteration. It’s very pure, and very hard to watch.

    I know I can’t thank you adequately for the hard slogging you’ve done all these years, but I want to say it again. Thank you!

  4. Peter Hamilton says

    September 24, 2017 at 4:59 am

    Your organization has done incredible work bringing forward the facts of pit bulls. In Vancouver, BC Lifeforce got the first ban on “pit bulls” and restrictions such as muzzling/properly enclosed kennel runs (not chaining) for existing pit bulls that would have helped protect people and the dogs. I also asked the breeders why not breed the inherent fighting instinct out of them? But that would stop their dog fighting “macho” business! My life was also at risk from the dog fighters/gaming industry.
    SPCAs and other misguided organizations quietly had the bylaw changed over the years. Shame, shame on them!

  5. Susan McDonough says

    September 24, 2017 at 1:42 pm

    As a police officer for 26 years, my focus was on animal cruelty. I worked on numerous dog fighting investigations and learned that pit bulls are the dog of choice for fighting. For decades, pitbulls have been bred and inbred to be extremely animal aggressive. The Gang Bangers of today will take the most aggressive pit bull in a little and that is who they use for breeding and inbreeding. The less aggressive dogs are usually the “bait” dogs. Thus, through no fault of their own, some pitbulls will attack another animal or small child who is crawling on the ground. No other dog breeders will breed dogs to be aggressive toward other animals. My heart goes out to the pit bulls, but I think the kindest thing we can do for them is stop allowing their breeding. Most of them that I’ve seen are leading miserable lives and humane euthanasia is often the only release we can give them to end their suffering.

  6. H. Blancher says

    September 25, 2017 at 3:25 pm

    Intelligent humans do not leave children alone with ANY dog. Rescued dogs need supervision 24/7. All dogs will “pack attack” just because they are dogs. Vick made “pit bulls” the dog du joir. Go back far enough and you’ll find humans wanting German Shepherds, Dobermans, Mastiffs eliminated. These dogs are loyal and protective; loving and fearless. They have a place among humans. But those humans need to remember that every dog is, just that, a dog. Responsibility for a dogs actions fall squarely upon their owners. I love my dogs and never put them in any situation where they may fail. Thick, short double leashes for walks away from crowds; constant refresher manners training; and teaching Human how to interact properly and safely with every dog.leave me and my spayed dog in peace.

  7. Deb says

    September 25, 2017 at 4:54 pm

    I agree with Susan, as I come from a similar life/professional experience. I have also been involved in pit bull rescue and can honestly say that while there are a few dedicated, compassionate people trying to change the macho, violent image of these dogs, a lot of pit bull people continue to display and train these poor pooches in a very negative manner. As an example; a so- called pit bull rescue group in our area had a fund-raising and education event at a local park. Amazingly, one of the exhibitions showed how pit bulls could jump onto and grab tires suspended from ropes. This spoke volumes to me about the true motives of most of these folks. This breed of dog has truly been victimized, with no end in sight.

    • Terry Huffman says

      October 1, 2017 at 3:30 pm

      The breed-type itself provides all the rationale needed behind BSL. Their “victimization” is neither here- nor- there in comparison to the disfiguring and fatal attacks w/in family settings where no one can be accused of training them to be vicious.

Quick links to coverage of dangerous dogs

FREE SUBSCRIPTION!!!

©

Copyright 2014-2023

Animals 24-7 · All Rights Reserved · Admin

 

Loading Comments...