
Beth Clifton in her years as a pit bull advocate.
by Beth Clifton
What do pit bulls have in common with other dogs? Not much actually, besides the obvious four legs, fur, two ears, and a tail––unless the ears have been cropped to make the pit bull look more dangerous.
To deny that pit bull genetics predisposes them to kill other living beings, and that their physical attributes have been methodically bred into the dogs by dogfighters past and present, is nothing less than wishful thinking, ignorance, delusion, and/or deliberate intent to deceive.
In the face of cold, hard facts from daily––yes, daily––police, emergency medical services, and media reports of pit bull attacks and fatalities across the U.S. and the world, humane organizations from the largest to the smallest and other pit bull lobbyists, rescuers, breeders and owners are still touting what purportedly great, angelic and idiosyncratic dogs pit bulls supposedly are.

(Beth Clifton photos)
The pit bull “hip-ocrisy”
Pit bull advocacy is fashionable, politically correct, and there are plenty of pit bulls to be had, for anyone who wants to join the pit bull “hip-ocrisy.” But it is all based on bold-faced lies.
Breeding and genetics have repeatedly eclipsed the behavior of even the most loved and well-cared-for pits, who demonstrate their propensity to kill even their own family members dozens of times per year against humans, tens of thousands of times per year against other dogs, cats, smaller pets, livestock, and wildlife.

Beth Clifton with one of the pit bulls for whom she was a rescue driver.
Contrary to the conventional beliefs of the public about dogs in general, I contend from my perspective as former pit bull rescuer, veterinary technician, animal control officer, and police officer––having personally handled far more pit bulls than most pit bull advocates ever will––that pit bulls demonstrate authentic individuality only to the extent that they are separate, living, breathing, and frequently suffering animals, typically abused and neglected by the very people who claim to love them most.
(See Why pit bulls will break your heart.)
“Dead game”
Otherwise, pit bulls have been selectively bred for centuries to exhibit uniquely stereotypical behavior in an especially single-minded way, oblivious even to their own injuries when attacking someone or something––even, in one notorious case, a concrete statue of a pig.
This behavior, the most prized pit bull attribute among pit bull fanciers, is called “gameness.” Most prized of all is “dead gameness,” a trait confirmed only when a pit bull dies with jaws still locked on a victim.

The U.K. Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 bans these breeds, but Staffordshire pit bulls (left) were exempted in 1997.
One need only spend some time with pit bulls to see just how alike they all are, but for size and coloration––and how different pit bulls are from other dogs in much of their common behavior.
Pro-BSL
A steadily growing network of “BSL” (Breed Specific Legislation) advocates are now fighting daily to inform the public about the dangers that the unique aspects of pit bull behavior and physiognomy pose.
BSL advocacy positions range from wanting to ban pit bull-type dogs completely to merely wanting to restrict their breeding, to prevent fatal, disabling, and disfiguring attacks on humans and other animals, prevent the glut of cast-off pit bulls now filling almost every animal shelter in the developed world, and yes, protect pit bulls themselves from being used and abused in fighting pits, as guards for criminal activity, and as fashion accessories for wanna-be bad guys and girls who are, most of all, bad to their dogs.

The United Kingdom banned pit bulls in 1991 but not Staffordshires, another name for the same dog.
New names & faces
Every day we see new names and faces, some of those faces grievously scarred, who have been harmed by pit bulls. Many have had their pets mauled and killed, suffering severe injuries in attempts at rescue. Some have had their livestock maimed or devoured alive by pit bulls.
Worst of all is almost daily becoming acquainted with more mothers, fathers, siblings, and children who have had their lives changed forever by losses of family members killed by the most vicious dog to ever be called a companion animal.
A pit bull is not a companion animal and never will be.

Trooper & grandson. See Why pit bulls will break your heart. (Beth Clifton photo)
I am a former pit bull owner, rescuer, & defender
Again, I am a former pit bull owner, rescuer and defender. This is really not something I am proud of. We have all made mistakes and been on the wrong side of issues. I have forgiven myself for my own poor decisions, but in the process have met, mostly via social media, several hundred and perhaps thousands of deeply alienated, hostile people who would not put me out if I were on fire, if I may paraphrase their vocal intentions.
Nor do these people exhibit authentic sympathy for the animal and human victims of their pit bulls, or even, in most cases, for the dogs themselves––apart from “crocodile tears” shed in GoFundMe appeals for pit bulls who have suffered the consequences of being put in jeopardy in various ways, including in attacking police officers who have had to use their sidearms.

(Beth Clifton photo)
The pit bull subjects of such GoFundMe appeals will be killed if others do not pay their veterinary expenses, and will be quickly replaced from the almost inexhaustible supply of other cast-off pit bulls, who magically become “rescued” as soon as they are passed from the custody of someone who bred or bought the pit bull into the hands (or back yard, on a chain) of a self-identified “rescue angel.”
(See How to tell a “bait dog” from “click bait”.)
Pit bull treason
In the minds of pit bull advocates, I have committed pit bull treason. My sentence for this alleged offense, as they have expressed, should be a slow, painful and gruesome death by torture, before a howling mob, without a trial.
I am not alone. There is not one outspoken BSL advocate who has not been targeted by the pit bull avengers, of whom there are many, echoing the viciousness of their dogs.
Even pit bull victims and their families are not spared by the bullies who, indeed, seem to especially enjoy lashing pit bull victims with cruel and sadistic attacks, “trolling” victims online and terrorizing them in person through deliberate and repeated close approaches with their dogs.
Often the pit bulls are barely held in check at the ends of leashes, frequently retractable leashes, which allow a pit bull to charge for a distance unknown to the victim, at full speed, and then sometimes break with catastrophic consequences.
In the view of pit bull bullies, “If it ain’t pit, it ain’t shit!”
(See “Don’t bully my breed, but we will bully the victims”)
Counting the dead & disfigured
My husband Merritt Clifton, founder and editor of www.animals24-7.org, has been logging fatal and disfiguring dog attacks since 1982. Merritt, a journalist for more than 48 years, has for most of that time reported on humane issues worldwide, for the betterment of all animals, humans, and the earth in general. He is a man of integrity and good character, with extensive background, expertise and experience in addressing animal issues of all sorts across the U.S. and around the world. Merritt has also been intensely targeted by the pit bull avengers for many years now, attracting more than 300 death threats and recommendations for the mode of execution in response to a single online posting, in one example where I actually counted the comments.

The man in the inset photo recently harassed passers-by in Bolton, England with six unleashed pit bulls, who bit three people during the incident. The attacks ended only after police shot two of the pit bulls dead.
(See “Pit Bull Awareness” day & month mark 33 years of exponentially accelerating pit bull mayhem.)
None of this has deterred us from our work.
Harassing & defaming
I cannot reconcile that people who so vehemently claim to love and care about their own animals, pit bulls specifically, do not give a damn about anyone else. We see Internet and social media rants, including threats of harm, harassment and death threats issued against anyone who disagrees that pit bulls are wonderful dogs, at the rate of many dozens in response to each of the many media reports per day of attacks by pit bulls.
Web sites and social media pages have even been established for the sole purpose of harassing and defaming individual pit bull attack victims and vocal victim advocates.

Can you identify Santa Claus?
(See Pit bulls, “bullying & backlash,” & who is really threatening whom.)
Set aside the threats and other nastiness, and the typical arguments of pit bull defenders distill down to clichés such as “My pit bull will lick you to death,” “the problem is at the other end of the leash,” and in my opinion the silliest, most deceptive, and the weakest of all pit bull advocacy arguments, the claim that “No one can identify a pit bull!”
Deadly deception
Indeed, pit bull advocates, rescues and shelters have frequently misidentified, mislabeled, and distributed pit bulls under false pretenses, calling them just about every other breed, mix, or general type of dog. The frequent outcome is that gullible adopters, family members, friends, and neighbors have been killed or maimed. Sometimes this results in those who have done the misidentification getting sued for millions of dollars in damages.

(Beth Clifton photo)
(See Family of pit bull victim sues the Clinton Humane Society.)
No amount of misidentification magically transforms a pit bull into anything else. This is a lesson the humane community should have learned from the catastrophic failure of the San Francisco SPCA’s attempt to rebrand pit bulls as “St. Francis terriers” in 1996, which got several household pet cats killed before the program was suspended.
Learning nothing
Unfortunately this experience apparently taught nothing to the chief architects of the “St. Francis terrier” debacle. Then-San Francisco SPCA president Richard Avanzino went on to commit much of the $300-plus million resources of Maddie’s Fund to pit bull advocacy as chief executive there from 1998 to 2015. Nathan Winograd, then the San Francisco SPCA director of law and advocacy, founded the ardently pro-pit bull No Kill Advocacy Center in 2007.

The tag team of pit bull advocates Jeff Theman, Josh Liddy, & Kim Wolf converged to heckle ANIMALS 24-7 editor Merritt Clifton at the Animal Rights 2014 conference in Los Angeles, but decisively lost the ensuing impromptu videotaped debate.
The consequences of failing to recognize and identify pit bulls for what they are, pit bulls, are getting people and animals killed.
Bulldogs, bullies and bravado, social dysfunction, financial gain and criminal behavior are at the heart of pit bull advocacy, including the lies and more lies told by animal shelter personnel hellbent on deceiving the public into adopting the dogs at any cost, in order to meet the 90% “live release rate” targets prescribed by Maddie’s Fund and the No Kill Advocacy Center.
In truth, achieving a 90% “live release rate” is no more realistic a goal for an animal shelter, when a third or more of the dogs received are pit bulls, than a 90% suspended sentence rate would be for a courtroom trying chiefly alleged violent offenders.

Why do you suppose Best Friends Animal Society pit bull legal counsel Ledy VanKavage tagged Beth Clifton’s daughter, whose son was attacked by a pit bull & with whom she was not acquainted, in this Facebook message?
(Beth Clifton collage)
Nightrider tactics will fail
As the public becomes aware that it has been lied to about pit bulls, most egregiously by formerly trusted institutions including the American SPCA, Best Friends Animal Society, the Humane Society of the U.S., and hometown humane societies and animal control agencies, change will follow.
The truth about pit bulls will at that point no longer allow a well-funded, well-organized army of selfish, dysfunctional individuals and organizations to dictate pit bull policy.
Pit bull advocacy, based on lies, bullying, and nightrider tactics reminiscent of the Ku Klux Klan, which for decades made pit bulls their dogs of choice for fighting and racial intimidation, will fall, and fall hard––just as the Klan itself did, once the public finally saw behind covert Klan alliances with political representatives and public safety institutions, and the pretense that the Klan was just another community service fraternity.
Just a matter of time
Public safety and the right to a peaceful, safe existence in our homes and communities, without the risk of unfamiliar pit bulls running through doggie doors to kill and injure anyone inside, is a right that we, as citizens and representatives of the humane community, must uphold and fight for.
Those who have sacrificed humane objectives, including the well-being of all animals and humans, on the altar of pit bull worship, must be held accountable, and will be, both by the courts of justice and the court of public opinion.

Merritt & Beth Clifton
The rate of collateral damage from pit bull advocacy long since became unsustainable. As the numbers of pit bull attacks on human and animal family members per year mount into the upper tens of thousands, when the reckoning will come is just a matter of time.
When I lived in Fremont, CA (Bay Area) I used to listen to Rich Avenzino’s radio program every Sunday afternoon…. and I remember the program where he announced they were ending the St. Francis Terrier program. It was only a couple of weeks when one of my students’ 4 year old cousin had her face ripped by the family Pit Bull and her ear chewed off.
This blew all my suppositions about dogs and behaviors out the window. I don’t know why it never occurred to me about WHY breeds were different, despite that I’d had mutts, and then purebred gun dogs (GSPs and my Drathaar) and had helped a friend show her GSDs and then train them for small police departments in upstate New York.
Pit bull attacks are perhaps the most ‘predictable’ behaviors in that they happen with the most frequency and in the most severe forms. Sadly pit bulls also have the largest percentage of owners with mental illnesses, which in many cases exacerbates the dangerousness…. i.e. the Bolton case. What sane person runs a pack of six of any breed, much less a bully breed, in public without all being on leashes? Of course he’ll whine, persuade a magistrate to return the four surviving dogs…. or is it ‘dogges”? and then blame the victims and the police.
Please continue your mission. I’m praying that one day we can rid our communities of pit bulls and dangerous dogs.
I cannot thank you enough for your article. You said everything I have been saying and have been attacked for. I have run a medium sized shelter where we rarely adopted out pits. The few times we did every step was taken including the requirement of training for the owner. The comment on the “end of the leash,” meaning the owners, is so right. People get these dogs and love to comment how great they are, but if you watch, the dog runs the show. If you try to place rules the dog really bucks it. I now train and test dogs. Rarely do I see a pit who really does have a great personality. I have tried to tell people to look at the DNA of the pit bull breeds and what were they bred to do: kill and not listen to people, a combination that is deadly. Keep it up!
Great article Beth; no big surprise for us who know you and Merritt. No one seeks and speaks the truth better than you two, in a world hell-bent on avoiding it.
Good one, Beth. Yours is a unique perspective – former pit owner, rescuer, advocate. Eyes wide open, brain cooly appraising, knowledge flowing to your fingertips and out into the public domain. No wonder the pit culties are angry with you. Keep it up. Thank you.
It took awhile for us to reach this point–in which even those with a negative pit bull story have to preface it with a timid, ‘now I’m not a hater, this one must have had a bad owner’–and it’s going to take awhile for us to get beyond all of this to a more well-informed and nuanced view.
Pit bulls are controversial, yes, but not nearly on the same level as abortion or gun control. Our society permits both sides of those issues and others to have their say and publically advocate their position. The pit bull issue is currently still “underground” enough that the people steering the debate are those with the most aggression and money. They can effectively shut down and intimidate the victims, who typically have neither. This issue cries out for an intelligent, mainstream examination a la “Frontline.” I think that is still a way off in the future, though.
Another aspect of modern society is that public discourse is, thanks to social media, extremely hateful and crass. This trend not only pushed Trump into the White House, but it also benefits the pit bull lobby immensely. I doubt very many of even the most antisocial pit bull fans would tell a grieving parent to their face that their child was ugly and deserved to die–as has actually happened on social media–but when these same people can hide behind a Facebook or Twitter account, they are willing to do and say just about anything.
Excellent article. I was also blamed for my attack, attacked as if I was “asking for it” like the old rape intolerance of “she was asking for it.” Not only was I threatened, by more than 30 people at one point, but my son and my animals were also threatened by these cowardly bully breed bullies. The dogs do what they were bred to do, but these pro pit frothers have a choice to behave the way they do, and for most, it is with sociopathic regularity.