Don Jordan, July 2, 1967-October 19, 2016.
(Seattle Animal Shelter photo)
Was youngest & longest-serving Seattle animal control chief
Donald Edward Jordan, 49, Seattle Animal Shelter director since 1996, on October 19, 2016 died in his sleep at his home in Snohomish, Washington.
Jordan was succeeded by Seattle Animal Shelter acting director and manager of field services Ann Graves.
Ann Graves, left, now Seattle Animal Shelter acting director, was honored at the 2016 NACA conference.
(Seattle Animal Shelter photo)
Graves was on October 7, 2016 named the 2016 Outstanding Animal Care and Control Employee of the Year at the National Animal Care & Control Association annual training conference, held in Seattle.
Don Jordan, believed to have been the longest-serving Seattle animal control director in the 162-year history of the city, and the youngest when appointed, left behind his wife of 27 years, Jenny, their four children Micheal Miller (Jaclyn), Amanda, Alyssa, and Donald, and a Lhasa Apso dog named Mickey.
(Beth Clifton collage)
“Can remember as a kid being chased by packs”
Growing up in Seattle and Lake Forest Park, a northern Seattle suburb, Jordan told Seattle Post-Intelligencer reporter Kery Murakami in January 2007, “I can remember packs of 10 to 15 dogs in Northeast Seattle, in Wedgwood. I can remember as a kid being chased by packs of dogs, around Northeast 88th and 28th Northeast.”
Earning a bachelor of science degree in zoology from Washington State University, Jordan joined the Seattle Animal Shelter law enforcement division in 1990. Starting as a humane officer, Jordan rose rapidly to head Enforcement and Field Services before his promotion to executive director.
Jordan assumed leadership of Seattle Animal Shelter just as new ideas were beginning to transform the animal care and control field.
Cut shelter killing by 75%-plus
The Seattle Animal Shelter building, for example, opened in 1972, had been designed to handle about 25,000 dogs and cats per year, with an average stay of about five days before being reclaimed, rehomed, sold for biomedical research, or killed. The latter was the fate of more than 90%.
“Ten years later, the city began offering low-cost neutering, and the number of animals going through the shelter dropped to about 7,000 a year,” Murakami wrote. But Seattle was still killing more than a dozen impounded dogs and cats per 1,000 human residents when Jordan was appointed.
Borrowing ideas from successful shelters all over the world, Jordan cut the Seattle Animal Shelter death rate by more than 75%. Among other innovations, Jordan introduced cooperation with nonprofit neuter/return feral cat control projects, adoption promotion partnerships with other agencies, use of volunteers, more than 400 of whom now assist the Seattle Animal Shelter paid staff of 38, and extensive renovation of the shelter itself to make it more visitor-friendly.
The original Skid Row: Yesler Street, Seattle. (Merritt Clifton collage)
Skid Row programs
Located only blocks from the site of the original “skid row” in the U.S., as the log-hauling route up Yesler Way was called in Seattle’s early years, the Seattle Animal Shelter under Jordan’s direction also became a national leader in extending spay/neuter and animal health services to homeless pet keepers.
Though Yesler Way was long ago redeveloped into Pioneer Square, a major local tourist attraction, the district remains a haunt of transients and vagabonds, many of whom keep dogs for personal protection, companionship, and as assistants in begging from passers-by.
Early in his tenure with the Seattle Animal Shelter, Jordan noticed that a disproportionate number of dog bite and running-at-large incidents involved the dogs of the transients, and began working with human services agencies and charities to ensure that the transients’ dogs were sterilized, vaccinated, and kept leashed.
From left to right: Don Jordan, veterinarian Mary Ellen Zoulas, and vet techs Jenny Chance and Traci Garcia.
(Seattle Animal Shelter photo)
National & international presence
By the mid-2000s Jordan had become a frequent speaker and panelist at national animal care-and-control conferences, served as president of the Washington Federation of Animal Care and Control Agencies, and often welcomed international visitors, in keeping, he told ANIMALS 24-7, with Seattle’s role as one of the U.S. gateways to the fast-developing cities of the Pacific Rim.
Throughout, Jordan worked to increase the Seattle Animal Shelters’ earned income and donations.
“It would be really an admirable goal to see the taxpayer subsidy reduced through the support of cat and dog owners,” Jordan told Murakami.
Don Jordan (in suit, rear left) with Seattle Animal Shelter staff.
(Seattle Animal Shelter photo)
Boosted licensing
Learning from the 2001 American Veterinary Medical Association Pet Population & Demographic Sourcebook that only 33,000 of the estimated 125,000 dogs in Seattle were licensed, and just 29,000 of the estimated 250,000 cats, Jordan in 2005 assigned one Seattle Animal Shelter staff member to doing licensing enforcement full-time, “patrolling parks, organizing direct-mail campaigns and following up with owners,” Murakami recalled. “That enforcement resulted in about 1,000 citations and 27% more licensed dogs and cats, which generated about $250,000 in new fees.
“It’s a regulatory fee by all means. It’s very similar to having car tabs,” Jordan said.
Seattle pet licensing compliance is still believed to be less than 50%, but is two to three times the U.S. average. License sales now raise more than $1 million of the Seattle Animal Shelter budget of more than $3 million per year.
Condolence cards
In March 2009, several years after increasing emphasis on enforcing pet licensing, Jordan at suggestion of volunteer Connie Starr began sending condolence cards to people who reported in response to annual licensing renewal reminders that their pets had died.
“We know pets are often the only family members people have,” Jordan told Seattle Times staff reporter Susan Gilmore. “We needed to do something extra and bring about great sense of closure by having someone else acknowledge how important pets were to them. By no means do we want to dupe people into coming here and adopting, but that would be fantastic since many need homes. We just want to let people know there are people who care.”
Don Jordan with pit bull.
(Seattle Animal shelter photo)
The condolence card campaign did increase adoptions, and brought in donations to the Seattle Animal Shelter too.
Dog attacks
An ongoing source of frustration to Jordan, however, was that even as the packs of free-roaming dogs who had terrorized him as a child disappeared, he had more success in reducing shelter killing than in preventing dog attacks.
Though subscribing to the philosophy that “We focus on the deed, not the breed,” “It’s not the dog but the owner,” and “It’s all in how you raise them,” Jordan nonetheless recognized that most of the most severe attacks are by pit bulls.
Don Jordan, Ed Steenman of Lynnwood Honda, & a pit bull at a promotional event.
(Steenman Associates photo)
“Pits are the dog of choice for drug dealers and young males 12 to 23,” Jordan told media in 2006.
“So dangerous we don’t want to place them with the public”
In 2008 Jordan spoke against a proposed ordinance which would have banned pit bulls from Seattle, but acknowledged to the local periodical The Stranger that Seattle Animal Shelter “receives about 600 ‘aggressive animal’ complaints a year, of which 300 involve a bite. Seven dogs were administratively declared dangerous last year, a designation requiring that they be euthanized or sent to live outside the city,” while the Seattle Animal Shelter euthanized 300 pit bulls and pit mixes altogether.
“They’re just so dangerous we don’t want to place them with the public,” Jordan said.
Please help us continue speaking truth to power:
http://www.animals24-7.org/donate/
All donations received during the remainder of 2016 will be matched by an anonymous benefactor, up to a total of $57,000!!!
Related Posts
“Animal control: what’s it all about?” asked Mike Burgwin
Hawaiian Humane Society CEO Pamela Burns dies after colorful 27-year tenure
Tom Hayden, author of California’s Hayden Act, dies at 76
Taiwan shelter director suicide illustrates global crisis
30-year ASPCA rep Julie Morris, 1955-2019: The paradox of “St. Julie”
The Animal Shelter by Patricia Curtis
As great at Don Jordan was, I was sad to read his thinking of “It’s all in how you raise them”. I fear it will take a very long time to convince the public this isn’t always true.
RIP Don Jordan, and heartfelt condolences to his family, loved ones, and colleagues. Sharing to social media, in appreciation of his important contributions to the welfare of those we love.
I had the honor of serving on the Seattle Animal Control Commission back in the ’90s under Don’s supervision. He was a very forward thinking individual and I was always so heartened that he was firmly against breed specific legislation. Under his guidance, the volunteer program came about and has since flourished. The shelter used to get regular protests by local ARA types who vilified the shelter and its practices. Under Don’s leadership, those (often unsubstantiated) complaints ceased. I was completely shocked to hear of Don’s passing, especially at such a young age. We, and the animals, are definitely poorer for his loss. My deepest condolences to Don’s family and SAS.
Unfortunately, more than twice as many disfiguring dog attacks occurred in Seattle during Don Jordan’s tenure as Seattle Animal Shelter director than in all the preceding 34 years that the agency handled animal control. This is typical of national trends; opposition to breed-specific legislation is the common denominator in why it has happened, with the only declines in attacks having come in cities that have had strong breed-specific legislation in effect. Jordan was very careful about which pit bulls he rehomed, to his credit, and his missions to the homeless population may also have helped to suppress the rise in numbers of attacks, but the first and most important duty of animal control is to protect the public from dog attacks. In that regard, Jordan’s opposition to breed-specific legislation did not serve the public interest.
“… more than twice as many disfiguring dog attacks occurred in Seattle during Don Jordan’s tenure as Seattle Animal Shelter director than in all the preceding 34 years that the agency handled animal control..” Sources, please?
The data cited comes from the log of fatal and disfiguring dog attacks occurring within the U.S. and Canada that I have personally maintained since 1982, now including particulars of attacks by nearly 7,000 dogs, more than 4,800 of them pit bulls, resulting in 654 fatalities, 363 of them by pit bulls, and nearly 4,300 disfigurements, more than 3,100 of them by pit bulls.
How would you address the general consensus from most animal organizations then that BSL does not reduce bite rates?
I would think increased numbers of animal control officers would be the most effective way to combat dangerous dogs. As everyone knows, any dog with aggressive behavior that is not properly secured at all times is a risk, regardless of breed, although to be fair, damage from small dogs will be less severe due to the small size of them.
Bottom line, know your dog and follow leash laws and use a muzzle if needed.
First, there is no “general consensus from most animal organizations” that “BSL does not reduce bite rates.” PETA, for one, strongly disagrees. Our data, collected from hundreds of cities and counties in the U.S., Canada, and around the world, shows that breed-specific legislation tends to reduce total dog bites by approximately the percentage to which the legislated breeds were part of the dog population before the ban was introduced. This includes the compensatory effect: e.g., replacement of pit bulls, if pit bulls are banned, with German shepherds, if German shepherds are not. (This would be replacing dogs who are about 8.5 to 11 times more likely to bite than the average dog, depending on which recent study one cites, with dogs who are about 4.5 times more likely to bite.)
But bites per se are not the main reason for adopting breed-specific legislation. Rather, the main reason for adopting breed-specific legislation is to prevent disfiguring and fatal attacks, which occur at the rate of about one per 10,000 bites. Pit bulls, for as far back as data exists, have accounted for well over half the attacks in this category, even though they have never accounted for more than 5% of the dog population, including all of their close mixes. (For data and regulatory history, see Links to more than 100 reasons why breed-specific legislation needs to be enforced and reinforced.)
Breed can not be tracked because it is rarely ever verified. Visual identification is not verification.
Every dog show ever held has been judged on visual criteria, including those held by fanciers’ organizations focused on pit bulls.
I cannot believe that you are using the event of Don’s death to promote your stance. There is a time and place and this is not it. My heart goes out to all who feel the loss of this man.
Our role, as news media, is reporting the facts in context. Don understood and respected this, throughout a long acquaintance during which we were several times co-panelists at conferences discussing these very issues.
I am so sorry to hear of Don Jordan’s death. I’m grateful to him for the extensive volunteer programs he fostered–word intended. I hope his family knows how many people will miss him.