David Glass, 51, of Lamar, Mississippi, was the 300th person to be fatally mauled by pit bulls in 32 years

Merritt Clifton (Beth Clifton photo)
by Merritt and Beth Clifton
David Glass, 51, of Lamar, Mississippi, on September 21, 2014 became the 300th person to be fatally mauled by pit bulls in the 32 years that I have logged fatal and disfiguring dog attacks within the U.S. and Canada.
While the Glass family grieves, I am adding up columns of numbers.
Thirty-two years ago, as a young reporter investigating the exotic animal traffic along the U.S./Canadian border for rural Quebec media, I expected these numbers to document the relative risk of keeping exotic pets, including big cats and constricting and venomous snakes, compared to the then very low risk of keeping dogs.
Having access to all of the major U.S. and Canadian newswires, I had begun tracking fatal and disfiguring exotic pet incidents in late 1978, tracking dog attacks as well to provide a standard of comparison. Though the advent of online news sources has made gathering animal attack information easier, other researchers who have backtracked attacks, notably Colleen Lynn of Dogsbite.org, have found very few that eluded my notice.
I made the dog part of the animal attack log breed-specific in September 1982, upon becoming aware that different breeds of dog have distinctly different attack behaviors.
German shepherd
A big German shepherd and a pit bull clarified that for me.
The German shepherd lived in a cage behind a house on the outskirts of Brigham, Quebec, having already been declared incorrigibly dangerous because of past incidents. One day in early summer 1982 he broke out of the cage and charged at a group of children who were just getting off the school bus. I was jogging toward the scene from the north, about 100 yards away. Brigham mayor Gilles Daignault––who loved dogs––was approaching in his car from the south, about the same distance away. Anticipating imminent harm to the children, Daignault accelerated, hit the German shepherd, suffered a heart attack, and died in his driveway two blocks away.
The German shepherd fell in the road unconscious. Unaware of what had happened to Daignault, I picked up the German shepherd and carried him back to his home and caretaker. The German shepherd was just waking up when I left. I was urged by the caretaker to leave as quickly as possible.
Twenty-four hours later I was jogging past the house in the opposite direction when the German shepherd broke loose again and charged me. I guessed that he mistook me for the cause of his injury. He gave me every possible warning sign before lunging, tearing my left wrist open, but on the open road I had no safe direction in which to retreat. I fought him off, wrapped my profusely bleeding wrist with my t-shirt, and was rushed to the nearest hospital, 20 miles away, by the Brigham postmaster.
Pit bull
I knew nothing even of the existence of the pit bull until he silently attacked me from behind two months later at about 5:00 p.m. on a busy street in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Hundreds of other people were walking or jogging along the same street. It was simply luck of the draw that I happened to be the closest to the open doorway through which the pit bull bolted out. I was ambulanced to receive emergency surgery, and flew home the next day to receive follow-up treatment back in Quebec, under the Quebec provincial health plan.
Even as I fought for my life in the street against the completely unprovoked pit bull attack, I recognized the extreme behavioral difference between the German shepherd, who appeared to have a motive for attacking me and gave enough warnings for me to have retreated safely if there had been anywhere to go, and the pit bull, who apparently attacked only because I was the nearest moving object.
This, I realized, would be worthy of further study. The German shepherd had followed all the classic rules of canine confrontation. The pit bull had behaved much more like a stealth predator. How many other variations might there be in dog attack behavior, and to what extent might this reflect what the dogs were bred and trained to do, for example hunting, herding and guarding flocks, patrolling human property, fighting and baiting, or simply serving as family companions?
Dobermans & huskies
When I made my dog attack log breed-specific a few weeks later, I did not expect pit bulls to appear in great numbers. I knew animal control officers who had served for decades without ever encountering any.
But I did expect see a lot of several other breeds.
German shepherds and shepherd mixes then made up 16% of U.S. shelter dog admissions. I expected to log a lot of German shepherds.
Dobermans, then also popular, were the most feared of breeds. Newspapers all over the U.S. in 1955 reported the fatal mauling of Winifred Bacon, 64, by her two Dobermans near Toms River, New Jersey. Five years later a Doberman killed his mistress, Frances Tetreault, 50, of Northvale, New Jersey. The second fatality in five years inflicted by a single breed of dog in one region lastingly established the bad reputation of Dobermans.
Bacon and Tetreault were killed toward the end of a 30-year time frame within which there were only 15 total U.S. dog attack fatalities. Nine of those 15 fatalities were inflicted by pit bulls, but the Doberman attacks occurred near the New York City media hub. The pit bull attacks had occurred chiefly in the rural South, and except for the 1945 fatal mauling of Doretta Zinke, 39, near Miami, had drawn little notice.
I did not yet know about the pit bull attacks, but I expected to log many Dobermans. In actuality, only 20 Dobermans and a few Doberman mixes have inflicted attacks severe enough to qualify for inclusion in my dog attack log.
Back in 1982, and for several years afterward, I expected attacks by huskies and other northern breeds to be the most numerous. My news beats for the past several years had included Native American affairs. I was well aware of the packs of semi-feral sled dogs and their untrained offspring roaming reservations, especially in the Far North. Every now and then some of these dogs attacked a child. They were often––and increasingly controversially––shot by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
Pit bull risk emerges
I was surprised when after a year I had logged as many fatal and disfiguring attacks by pit bulls as by all other breeds combined. As pit bulls then were completely uncontroversial and still little known, I attributed this to a fluke of small sample size, and kept collecting data.
My primary news beats in rural Quebec included public health and occupational safety. This led to frequent research assignments from the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health & Safety. I discussed my dog attack data compilation with the Centre epidemiologists. They affirmed my methods, but shared my bewilderment that pit bulls continued to account for half or more of all the fatal and disfiguring attacks, year after year. They too had never seen a pit bull.
Eight years after beginning my log of fatal and disfiguring dog attacks, I became news editor for the Animals’ Agenda magazine, and began to publish my findings. By then it was clear that what I was discovering was no fluke: pit bulls were indeed more dangerous than all other dog breeds combined, even though they were still only 2% of U.S. shelter dog admissions and 1% of the total dog population.
A year after that, in 1989, Denver, Miami, and several other U.S. cities banned pit bulls. Pit bull advocacy emerged to try to deny the weight of evidence.
Wolf hybrids & Rottweilers
Over the past 25 years several other dog breeds have emerged as exceptionally likely to kill and disfigure humans. Wolf hybrids rose to popularity, then faded out, after state and provincial wildlife agencies successfully asserted jurisdiction over breeding and selling them. Rottweilers and various mixes of pit bull with mastiff have also proved to be as deadly as pit bulls, proportionate to their numbers.
But for 32 consecutive years pit bulls have accounted for half or more of the fatal and disfiguring dog attacks in each and every year. Never has any other breed category accounted for even half as many.
While David Glass became the 300th human fatality in my log, all other dog breeds combined, including Rottweilers, Akitas, Cane Corsos, Dobermans, huskies, and German shepherds, have killed 268 people––an appalling toll in itself, considering how rare fatal dog attacks were for 30 years before 1960.
History refutes fallacious arguments
The scarcity of fatal dog attacks between 1930 and 1960 belies the frequent argument of pit bull apologists that fatal dog attacks occur because negligent caretakers fail to neuter male dogs and allow them to run free. Exhaustive research done by National Family Opinion Survey founders Howard and Clara Trumbull, published by the American Humane Association, established that as of 1960 less than 1% of the dogs in the U.S. and Canada were sterilized; the dog population in 1937 skewed as heavily as 9-1 toward males because of the common practice of drowning unwanted female pups to avoid accidental litters; and throughout those three decades practically all dogs ran free except in the busiest parts of big cities. Indeed, as of 1950, about a third of the dogs in the U.S. were unowned street dogs, as in much of the developing world today.
Historical research has subsequently found that pit bulls have killed half or more of all human dog attack victims in every 10-year time frame since 1844, while never accounting for more than a small proportion of the total dog population. As of 1961, dogfighting investigators for the Humane Society of the U.S. estimated, there were only about 200,000 pit bulls in the entire U.S., of whom about 10% were actually fought in any given year.
The U.S. pit bull population has expanded about twenty-fold since then, to about four million dogs counting close mixes. About one million pit bulls per year are surrendered to animal shelters or are impounded, primarily for dangerous behavior. About 80% of the pit bulls coming to animal shelters each year flunk behavioral screening––and attempts at behavioral remediation––and are killed as too dangerous to adopt.
Human fatalities from pit bull attacks have expanded about twenty-fold as well, to 30-plus per year.
Shelter dog attacks
When I began my breed-specific dog attack log, the U.S. and Canadian humane communities promoted dog adoptions by proudly boasting that no adopted shelter dog had ever killed or seriously injured anyone. This remained true from 1858, when Anne Waln and Elizabeth Morris opened the first U.S. shelter known to have done adoptions, until 1988, when a newly rehomed wolf hybrid killed a child. Another newly rehomed wolf hybrid killed a child in 1989. The ensuing lawsuit forced the shelter that adopted out the wolf hybrid into bankruptcy. The sheltering community learned a bitter lesson. There was not another fatal attack by a shelter dog until 2000. Then there were three through 2009––one by a pit bull, one by a Doberman, one by a bull mastiff.
By then, however, pit bull advocacy had exploded into an industry in the wake of the 2007 Michael Vick dogfighting case. After appeals on behalf of the Vick dogs proved lucrative for the Best Friends Animal Society and the American SPCA, other humane organizations including the Humane Society of the U.S. jumped on the bandwagon, funding campaigns to repeal breed-specific legislation which had held pit bull proliferation and attacks in check in many cities, and to promote pit bull adoptions from shelters.
The results were predictable.
Of the 210 fatal dog attacks occurring since January 1, 2010, 138––66%––have been inflicted by pit bulls.
Thirty-five shelter dogs have killed people. Among those shelter dogs have been 25 pit bulls, seven bull mastiffs, two Rottweilers, an alleged golden retriever who appeared to be part pit bull, and a husky.
The pit bull toll on other animals
Human fatalities are only the smallest part of the toll of death and suffering occurring from the humane community having abdicated responsibility to the public and other animals to allow, indeed encourage, an ever-growing abundance of dogs created specifically to rip living beings apart alive in fighting and baiting events, in pursuit of fugitive slaves, and in helping the Ku Klux Klan to conduct lynchings.
Throughout the year 2013 I applied to estimating the numbers of fatal pit bull attacks on other animals essentially the same statistical approach that epidemiologists use to estimate the incidence of sexually transmitted disease. The method, described in full at http://wp.me/p4pKmM-bS, is designed to conservatively account for under-reporting.
Based on that study, the animal toll from pit bull attacks in 2013 was upward of 41,000, or a little over twice the toll from all dog attacks that USDA Wildlife Services estimated circa 2000. About 6,500 fatal attacks on other animals are likely to have been inflicted by pit bulls from shelters and rescues.
“First, do no harm.”
I have spent almost my entire life committing journalism and doing research on behalf of animals, including dogs. I remember the shelter conditions of 50-60 years ago, spent an entire year counting street dogs and feral cats in nine nations of Europe instead of attending the fifth grade, was present in 1972 when Berkeley became the first city in the world to abolish killing homeless animals by decompression, began actively promoting cat sterilization in 1976, was already logging mass neglect cases and other data of use to the humane community before beginning to take a breed-specific look at dog attacks, and was chosen to be keynote speaker at the first No Kill Conference in Phoenix in 1995 in recognition of years of effort to prevent surplus animal births and demonstrate alternatives to high-volume shelter killing.
My understanding, these many decades, has always been that the first and most basic goal of humane work is to prevent animal and human suffering. The preamble to the Hippocratic Oath taken by physicians might appropriately be taken, as well, by humane workers: “First, do no harm.”
My most significant finding from 32 years of logging fatal and disfiguring dog attacks, unfortunately, is not that pit bulls consistently commit most of the attacks.
Rather, it is that much of the humane community has lost sight of the goal of preventing suffering, in pursuit of avoiding euthanizing physically healthy animals, no matter how deranged or inherently dangerous those animals are.
Further, absorbed in futile efforts to rehome every animal, much of the humane community has become distracted from the need to prevent the births of the animals who are most likely to kill others, and in turn to be killed.
I intend to continue logging fatal and disfiguring dog attacks for as long as I am able, hoping that it will not take 32 more years for the humane community to return to humane values and common sense concerning pit bulls and other dangerous dogs.
Thank you for this piece. I’m surprised that we never ran into each other in the past.
I never saw a pit bull until I was taken to a ‘camp’ where fighting dogs were chained. My first reaction was that these dogs are friendly, they aren’t vicious. I was greeted with happy dogs, glad to see me. I started up to pet a pit when the dogman said to stay at the end of the length of the chain at all times. I petted the dogs, no problem. This is exactly why people think the pit is not a fighter. They see friendly dogs during their raids, but they don’t let the dogs get close to each other. If they did, then they would see the true pit come out. There is but a thin line separating human and dog aggression. People are mauled and killed trying to save their own beloved pet. HSUS has done its share to undermine safety when they speak of these pits from the dogmen being so friendly. It’s all a lie, pit bulls lie.
One only has to see the pit in action to realize what a threat they are.
Words are not enough to express my gratitude to you for your commitment to the safety and well beings of humans. I ask for many blessings and God’s protection over you as you bring this vital information to us. Knowing that those who would not wish this information released will inevitably attack you and attempt to discredit you makes me even more appreciative. Thank you for your dedication, commitment and tenacity.
Annie B
As an animal activist I have met many other animal loving people. Not only in north america but also in other countries. They claim that is Not the dog’s fault. I have heard of cases where these dangerous dogs were raised in the family with small children,were gentle and they were loved, cared and part of the family. Unfortunately, the small children were attacked and killed by these dogs. Is their genetic and they are Not to be trusted.
Thank you for your informative article on pit bulls. Your comment
“Further, absorbed in futile efforts to rehome every animal, much of the humane community has become distracted from the need to prevent the births of the animals who are most likely to kill others, and in turn to be killed.”
struck a chord. I began to notice this trend a few years ago myself. People who had been focused on preventing unwanted litters began to drift away and to spend their time, energy and funds fighting legislation to stop breeding certain dogs. I never have fully understood why anyone would fight efforts to stop breeding of those very animals who were filling the shelters – as pit bulls do today throughout the country. If these folks really are “no kill” then they would redirect their efforts to reduce the numbers of these breeds.
We came very close to ending overpopulation and the suffering it engenders – why stop now? There is still a great deal of work to be done – much of it educating the public about the importance of “fixing” cats prior to first heat. And most dogs as well.
You’re definitely preaching to the choir in this case. Agree 100%. Facts don’t lie. And heartened to see the three posters before me agree as well.
I totally agree that focused efforts to spay/neuter pit bulls (or dogs chronically misidentified as such) are warranted because so many are dying in our shelters. Spay/neuter is a way to reduce their numbers, their intake and the number of shelter deaths. Where I remain unpersuaded is your argument that pit bulls are so dangerous their humane elimination from our culture should be a goal of the animal welfare field. You base your argument on 300 fatalities by dogs identified as pit bulls over the past 32 years, compared to 268 by other breeds combined. All this tells me from a statistical perspective is that pit bulls (or dogs called pit bulls) are relatively dangerous compared to other dogs, but not that they are dangerous per se to the point where they should be legislated out of existence. For example, it may be that a higher percentage of auto fatalities can be attributed to SUVs, making them relatively dangerous cars, but the total number of deaths may not be enough to justify banning them. 300 pit bull fatalities comes to less than 10 per year – each one tragic, but perhaps not a large enough sample to jump to the conclusion pit bulls are so dangerous they shouldn’t exist. If there are 1 million pits in the U.S. today as you say, that means 999,990 of them were not involved in serious maulings in the past year. I’m not saying your position is invalid, just I’m not seeing enough data to accept it. Add on to my doubt that misidentification of dogs as pits who have no trace of the breed genetically may be common.
General Motors has this year recalled 29 million cars in North America alone because of faulty ignition switches which the Fatality Analysis Reporting System believes were responsible for 74 deaths over the preceding 10 years. General Motors argues that the faulty ignition switches contributed to only 13 deaths. Either way, pit bulls in the U.S., never numbering more than four million, killed 217 people during the same time span, meaning that pit bulls were at minimum about 21 times more deadly than the faulty ignition switches, which GM has spent $1.2 billion to repair. The number of people injured as result of the faulty ignition switches is unknown; at least 1,624 have been disfigured by pit bulls. The number of other animals killed because of the faulty ignition switches is probably zero. The number of other animals killed by pit bulls runs close to 200,000.
As Merritt and I have been pointing out to the humane community for years, human deaths aren’t the only danger and unnecessary tragedy the presence of the pit bull type dog is chronically causing. According to Merritt’s latest calculations, they are mauling or killing on average about 120 animals every single day in North America.
https://www.animals24-7.org/2014/03/22/how-many-other-animals-did-pit-bulls-kill-last-year/
According to police records in the Netherlands, where a pit bull ban was lifted six years ago, pit bulls are mauling or killing another dog every single day in every large Dutch city. These records include only instances where the owners of the other dogs were persistent in filing a police report in the face of police resistance to taking down a report. It does not include the killing of dogs whose owners were intimidated by police refusal, of non-dog pets or of livestock.
Besides these animal maulings/killings by pit bulls, there is the return of dogfighting. Police are again finding dead pit bulls in public parks after the weekends — many of them hung in trees for a slow death, drowned, or otherwise sadistically killed likely for losing a pit fight. Others perhaps because their owners simply didn’t want them any more, but didn’t feel like paying the fee for dumping them at a shelter. During the ban, the Netherlands was euthanizing on average about 30 pit bulls a year, yes, nationwide. Within only four year of the ban’s repeal, the number of pit bulls born only to be killed as unwanted a year or two later at shelters had exploded exponentially.
http://17barks.blogspot.nl/2012/06/pit-bulls-and-shelter-bankruptcy.html
Two years along, that situation is even worse. The Dutch Society for Protection of Animals recently published a report stating that pit bulls and their mixes now make up 22% of all Dutch shelter dogs. In urban areas, up to 80% of shelter dogs are pit types.
It’s sad that not only Kortis, but also most of the humane community, seem to be indifferent to the maulings and deaths of so many animals, and to the suffering their stance is causing for the pit bull itself. At this point, any stance against breed specific legislation can’t any longer be seen as an animal-loving or even a pit bull loving stance. It can only be seen as a consumerist stance, aimed at protecting the wish of spoiled consumers to have the consumer fashion item of their choice. Never mind what that does to animals, and never mind even what that does to pit bulls.
Merritt, I’ve described you as the Rand Paul of animal welfare blogging: you have my agreement right up to the point I go, “Wha?!” I have one specific question and one observation I’d like to get your take on. First, what exactly and explicitly (and briefly) would be your ideal, you become God, solution if you had your choice? Second, your basis of action is one statistics to paint all individuals of the group based on the actions of others. This, applied to humane populations, is the justification for stop and frisk and racial profiling laws. The argument against is the same: young, black men are statistically more likely to kill. Do we imprison ALL young black men as a result? Would Asians the. Have an argument to lock up the white men ahead of them on crime statistics? Once put bulls are not an issue, do we then move down the line to other breeds or dogs as a species? I’m not being snarky, I would genuinely like to know how you view this. Karel
First, no human racial or ethnic group has ever been selectively bred for hundreds of generations, as pit bulls have been, to maximize their propensity and capacity for wreaking mayhem. Second, the total number of pit bulls and close pit mixes in the U.S. at any given moment is about 3.5 to four million. About a third of these dogs at any given moment are puppies under one year of age. About a third will be surrendered to animal shelters or impounded for dangerous behavior within one year’s time––typically after passing through a birth home, an acquisition home, and at least one pass-along home before surrender or impoundment. This leaves only about a third of pit bulls in homes sufficiently stable that they will be there for even 20% of the normal duration of a dog in a home. This also means that approximately half of the adult pit bull population are failing in homes each and every year. Nothing even remotely comparable has ever occurred with any other type of dog. If 50% of almost anything else with an expected lifespan of 10-15 years fails within a year or two of manufacture, we stop making, acquiring, and promoting it.
Mr Clifton, I have been an animal welfare activist since 1975; not long after that I began subscribing to Animals’ Agenda, which is where I first heard your name. I worked in a shelter in the 1980s and now run a small animal rescue (I’ve been active with two).
You and I are of one mind on this issue. It is deplorable that the animal community has moved away from the ultimate goal of relieving animal suffering, and instead focus on “saving them all” even if it means causing a cat to live in a small cat cage for two years in a slow-kill shelter, “as long as she’s not put to sleep!” Euthanasia is not the enemy as long as it is done humanely. Suffering is the enemy.
The increasing number of aggressive dogs are a real concern for those of us who wish to attend shelter fundraisers and dog parks with our pets. These places have gone from pleasant places where people and dogs can socialize, to something more frightening.
I wonder if shelters, rescues, and animal welfare groups are realizing how many people they are scaring away when they allow dogs to exhibit intimidating behavior, such as lunging and snarling, at their fundraising events. Dog parks, too, are becoming nasty places in many areas of the country, with dogs being mauled and killed.